Advanced Search Results
Brakes India Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliati ...
Chennai
V. Bakthavatsalam, J.
Jun-29-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A and 33(2)
(1995)ILLJ24Mad
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J. 1. The petitioner - Management has filed this writ petition, challenging the order of the 1st respondent passed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act dated 2-8-1991, refusing to grant approval of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Indian Bank Ltd. Represented HereIn by Its Dy. Gen. Manager, Reg ...
Chennai
V. Bakthavatsalam, J.
Dec-02-1993
Labour and Industrial
(1994)IILLJ1171Mad
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J. 1. The prayer in W. P. No. 13749 of 1993 is for the issue of writ of mandamus forbearing the first respondent from proceeding with the Appeal in T. S. E. No. 10 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Express (Madurai) Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Collector of Custo ...
Chennai
Bakthavatsalam, J.
Jan-30-1989
Customs
1990(26)ECC140
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioners seek the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records to quash the communication No. 58/264/87 SIB dated 14.12.1988 of the respondent and to direct the respondent to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Tirupathi Plastics Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Chennai
Bakthavatsalam, J.
Mar-11-1992
Customs
1993(41)ECC13
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner challenges the order of adjudication passed by the third respondent on 27.12.1991.2. The petitioner earlier came up to this Court in W.P. No. 15619 of 1991 and by order dated 28.11.1991 reported...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Bharathi Mills and anr. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise
Chennai
Bakthavatsalam, J.
Sep-14-1990
Excise
1991(34)ECC156
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The prayer in W.P.No. 9832 of 1989 is as follows: .to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to refund tothe petitioner the amount of Rs. 10,081-03...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSugesan Finance Investment Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Bakthavatsalam, J.
Jan-22-1990
Banking
Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 140 and 142
[1992]75CompCas298(Mad)
Bakthavatsalam, J. 1. The petitioner has come up to this court praying for the issue of a writ of declaration declaring that section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, introduced by the Banking, Public Financial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThanthai Periyar Transport Corpn. Ltd. Vs. P. Sivagnanam and anr.
Chennai
V. Bakthavatsalam, J.
Jul-05-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 11A
(1994)ILLJ1093Mad; (1993)IIMLJ645
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J. 1. Both the writ petitions are directed against the award of the Labour Court in I. D. No. 381 of 1986 one by the management-Corporation against the order of the Labour Court ordering reinstatement...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThiruvalluvar Transport Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Labour a ...
Chennai
Bakthavatsalam, J.
Jun-23-1993
Labour and Industrial
Tamilnadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981
(1995)ILLJ648Mad
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J. 1. The second respondent, who was working as Conductor under the Petitioner-Corporation,was kept under suspension by an order dt. March 11, 1988 and a charge was also framed against the 2nd respondent, that he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.P. Srinivas Vs. Income-tax Officer, Film Ward I, Madras and ors.
Chennai
Bakthavatsalam, J.
Apr-20-1989
Family
Constitution of India - Article 226; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 10; ;Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 138(1)
AIR1989Mad284
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. When the miscellaneousPetition came up for hearing, by consent ofboth parties, the main writ petition itself istaken up for the disposal. 2. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows: '.....to issue a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement of Tvs Suzuki Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
K.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.
Feb-21-1992
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 10(1), 18 and 19; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1992(65)FLR971]; (1993)ILLJ855Mad; (1992)IIMLJ432
K.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. The short question that has to be considered in this case is whether a reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act by the Government is valid, when the charter of demands...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »