Advanced Search Results
Gangadhar Dhanjishet Vs. Lakshman Mahadev Kulkarni
Mumbai
Patkar and ;Baker, J.
Dec-19-1929
Property
AIR1930Bom221; (1930)32BOMLR431
Baker, J.1. The contest in this case is between the first mortgagee who purchased in execution of a decree on his mortgage and the auction-purchaser in execution of a decree on the second mortgage. One Chindu...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBapu Shivaji Naik Vs. Kashiram Hanmantrao Ghag
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Jan-24-1929
Property
(1929)31BOMLR658
Baker, J.1. [After setting out the facts of the case, his Lordship proceeded :] The position is that the plaintiff having been awarded possession by this Court of the one anna share which he purchased from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShriniwas Vithal Pai Vs. Hari Sabaji Kamat
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Dec-07-1928
PropertyCivil
(1929)31BOMLR652
Baker, J.1. These are companion appeals arising out of two suits in which the point is the same and may be disposed of in one judgment. The plaintiff sued for a declaration that the property in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajrajeshwarashram Vs. Svarupanandtirtha
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Baker, J.
Jan-18-1927
Property
AIR1927Bom499; (1927)29BOMLR1031; 103Ind.Cas.637
Amberson Marten, C.J.1. This is a preliminary question as to what security for costs should be paid by the appellant who resides out of British India in respect of an appeal from the refusal of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEphrayim H. Ephrayim Vs. Turner, Morrison and Co.
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Feb-25-1930
Civil
AIR1930Bom511; (1930)32BOMLR1178
Baker, J.1. A preliminary point has been taken on behalf of the defendants that the plaint is not properly signed, inasmuch as it was signed by a person holding not a general power of attorney but...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParashram Yeshvantshet Alwe Vs. Lakshmibai Babaji Samant
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Nov-07-1928
Property
(1929)31BOMLR229
Baker, J.1. The facts of this appeal are set out at length in the judgments of the Courts below, and since the appeal turns entirely on two points of law, I do not think it is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBibi Fakrubibi Vs. Saiyad Mahomadmiya Badamiya
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Feb-17-1932
Property
(1932)34BOMLR971
Baker, J.1. The plaintiff sued to recover Rs. 50 from the defendants, who are the widow and children ofhis deceased brother Yasinmiya, alleging that he and certain other persons were sharers in certain property set apart...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaridas Gangadas Vs. Ramdas Dharamdas
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Jul-08-1930
Family
(1930)32BOMLR1381
Baker, J.1. The plaintiff sued to obtain possession of the property mentioned in the plaint from defendant No. 1, alleging that it belonged to one Gangadas Ramdas, and after him to his disciple Ganeshdas, and that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandu Mahipat Vs. Shivshankardas Shivlaldas
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Nov-29-1928
PropertyCivil
(1929)31BOMLR335; 118Ind.Cas.702
Baker, J.1. These are three companion appeals which may be disposed of in one judgment. They arise out of three suits brought by the Jahagirdar of; Nandurbar in Khandesh against certain tenants to recover possession of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParshottam Dahyabhai Dave Vs. Desaibhai Chunthabhai Patel
Mumbai
Baker, J.
Jan-28-1932
Property
(1932)34BOMLR852
Baker, J.1. The plaintiffs sued to recover possession of the plaint property, alleging that it belonged to one Motilal Harjivan, their uncle, who made a will in their favour on July 7, 1910, that Motilal thereafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »