Advanced Search Results
In Re: K. Venkappa and Four ors.
Chennai
Ayling, J.
Aug-18-1913
Criminal
(1915)ILR38Mad305
ORDERAyling, J1. The petitioners have been convicted of an offence under Section 283, Indian Penal Code, by leaving a 'prabha' lying in a public road for 24 hours so as to cause obstruction.2. The first point...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Uppala Kotayya Nagaram
Chennai
Ayling, J.
Sep-03-1915
Criminal
AIR1916Mad683(1); 30Ind.Cas.656
ORDERAyling, J.1. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate remarks that accused was 'not a pariah, but a govandla ryot owning some lands to whom imprisonment in stocks is a great disgrace;' and on this account has reduced the sentence....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ramasamier and ors.
Chennai
William Ayling, J.
Oct-07-1915
Criminal
30Ind.Cas.1001
ORDERWilliam Ayling, J.1. The order of the second Class Magistrate of Pattukottah, dated 12th April 1915, purporting to dispose of Calendar Case No. 1308 of 1918 runs as follows: 'In this case, while the trial was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Hassan Sahib
Chennai
William Ayling, J.
Oct-11-1915
Criminal
AIR1916Mad1028(1); 30Ind.Cas.1004
ORDERWilliam Ayling, J.1. This reference involves the question of whether sand falls within the category of 'other building material' in Bylaw No. 45 of the Ootacamund Municipality.2. The By-Law runs as follows: 'Every vehicle used within...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Gontla Krishnamma
Chennai
William Ayling, J.
Sep-30-1915
Criminal
AIR1916Mad762(2); 30Ind.Cas.1005
ORDERWilliam Ayling, J.1. Every act in breach of the conditions of the license or permit is a distinct offence and under Section 233 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be made the subject of a separate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSree Raja Venkata Rangaya and ors. Vs. Murela Venkaya and ors.
Chennai
Ayling, J.
Mar-14-1912
Limitation
14Ind.Cas.259
Ayling, J.1. The cause of action arose in September 1904 and plaintiff is entitled to file his suit in the proper Court within a period from that time of 3 years plus any periods for which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeruri Somanna and ors. Vs. Grandhi Manikam
Chennai
Ayling, J.
Mar-24-1912
Contract
14Ind.Cas.517
Ayling, J.1. The appellant's Vakil seeks to distinguish this case from Venhata Chinnaya Row v. Venkataramaya 4 M.k 137 on the ground that, here, no consideration can be said to have moved from the plaintiff. It...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGogi Padmarajappa and anr. Vs. Madduru Venkatasubbiah
Chennai
Ayling, J.
May-12-1914
Civil
AIR1914Mad311; 24Ind.Cas.423
Ayling, J.1. The only question is whether the District Munsif was right in holding that the suit was not cognizable by his Court under Section 20(e) of the Civil Procedure Code.2. The suit is for recovery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re : Nalliveerathevan and anr.
Chennai
Ayling, J.
Apr-23-1914
Criminal
24Ind.Cas.351
ORDERAyling, J.1. The evidence certainly justified the conviction of second accused in the alternative under Section 379 or Section 411, Indian Penal Code, and also the conviction of 1st accused under Section 215, Indian Penal Code....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalusu Lakshmayya and ors. Vs. Emperor
Chennai
Ayling, J.
Aug-22-1912
Criminal
16Ind.Cas.520
ORDERAyling, J.1. The judgment of the Deputy Magistrate does not comply with the requirements of Section 367, Criminal Procedure Code. There is a long recital of the facts preceding the alleged offence, but no discussion of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »