Advanced Search Results
Cce, Raipur Vs. M/S. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: P Chacko
Feb-27-2001
Service Tax
1. This is Revenue's appeal. Ld. SDR Shri Swatantra Kumar submits that there is a communication from the Commissioner stating that the Central Board of Excise and Customs has found this case not to be a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Cement Works Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: P Chacko
Aug-18-2003
Excise
(2003)(160)ELT811TriDel
1. The issue involved in these appeals is whether during November, 1995 to Feb., 1996, the below-mentioned items were eligible for capital goods credit under Rule 57Q :- (1) Hacksaw Blades used in the factory for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. U.T. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: P Chacko
Jan-20-2004
Excise
(2004)(93)ECC82
1. The respondents were engaged in the manufacture of goods falling under Chapters 68, 84 and 87 of the CETA Schedule and availing the Modvat credit facility under Rules 57A and 57Q of the erstwhile Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jindal Stainless Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Author: P Chacko
Dec-17-2004
MRTP
(2005)(98)ECC698
through their CHA, for export of stainless steel coils through Chennai port during the last week of December 2003 and the first week of January 2004 The shipping bills were filed by the CHA under Zero...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce and Advance Detergent Ltd. Vs. Advance Detergent Ltd. and Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Author: P Chacko
Mar-10-2005
Excise
(2005)(100)ECC561
1. M/s. Advance Detergents Ltd., (assessee) were engaged in the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid (LABSA, for short), for which 98% Sulphuric Acid and Linear Alkyl Benzene were used as inputs. What was called...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Chandigarh Vs. M/S Oswal Fats and Oils Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: P Chacko
Mar-21-2001
Service Tax
1. The respondents had taken modvat credit on various capital goods and inputs during April-May, 1996. The jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner disallowed such credit to the extent of of Rs.1,47,159.28.But the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDyanamic Engineers Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: P Chacko
Oct-10-2003
Excise
(2004)(91)ECC313
1. Having examined the records and heard both the sides, we find that this case is fit for summary remand. Accordingly, we allow the stay application and proceed to dispose of the appeal.2, The appeal is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmbuja Cement Rajasthan Ltd. and Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: P Chacko
Nov-28-2003
Service Tax
(2004)(91)ECC484
1. These appeals are against the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) denying to the appellants Modvat credit on explosives used at off factory mines for producing limestone. The relevant periods, in respect of which the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCc Vs. Lovely Offset Printers
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Author: P Chacko
Mar-10-2005
Land Acquisition
(2005)(100)ECC559
1. The respondents had imported printing machinery and cleared the same through Tuticorin port under Bill of Entry dated 6.2.96 by paying duties of Customs at applicable rates. Later on, the machinery was found to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›