Advanced Search Results
Segu Baliah Vs. N. Ramasamiah
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Mar-13-1917
Right to Information
42Ind.Cas.608
Abdur Rahim, J.1. This is not a case of an order either under Section 195 or Section 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It is a permission granted to the Receiver, who is an officer of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubbaraya Rowthu Minda Nainar and Vs. Kuppusamy Aiyangar and ors.
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J., ;Abdur Rahim, J.
Feb-12-1909
Property
1Ind.Cas.535
Arnold White, C.J.1. I agree with the conclusion at which my learned brother has arrived in his judgment, which I have had the advantage of reading.2. It seems to me, however, that the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubbaraya Rowthu Minda Nainar and Muthukumarasawmy Vs. Kuppusawmy Aiya ...
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J. and ;Abdur Rahim, J.
Feb-15-1909
Civil
(1911)ILR34Mad442
Arnold White, C.J.1. I agree with the conclusion at which my learned brother has arrived in his judgment, which I have had the advantage of reading.2. It seems to me, however, that the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Davaluri Virayya
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Mar-19-1909
Land Acquisition
1Ind.Cas.560
ORDERAbdur Rahim, J.1. As pointed out by the referring Magistrate, the order of the Sub-Magistrate was quite unjustified. The Sub-Magistrate refers to Section 480, Criminal Procedure Code, but he had power only to deal with the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Manikkam Pillai
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Oct-08-1920
Criminal
60Ind.Cas.55; (1920)39MLJ714
Abdur Rahim, J.1. In this case the Additional District Magistrate should have given notice to the petitioner, who was complainant in the ease, before making the order of transfer. The complainant had obtained an order for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPasupathy Mudali and ors. Vs. A. Subramanya Gurukkal
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Apr-08-1909
Land Acquisition
2Ind.Cas.428
ORDERAbdur Rahim, J.1. This order is clearly illegal and must be set aside. The Magistrate has passed the order without in any way trying to conform to the provisions of Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Manikam Pillai
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Sep-29-1908
Criminal
3Ind.Cas.609a
ORDERAbdur Rahim, J.1. There can be no doubt that the facts alleged against the accused do not constitute an offence under Sections 419 and 511 Indian Penal Code, as it is not alleged that his attempt...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Venketaramiah and anr.
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Nov-13-1908
Criminal
4Ind.Cas.1117
ORDERAbdur Rahim, J.1. There can be no doubt that the facts found, namely that the accused took away the boat licenses from the boatmen with the result that the authorities did not permit the boat to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArimuthu Chetty Vs. Vyapuripandaram
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Mar-24-1911
Civil
(1912)ILR35Mad588
Abdur Rahim, J.1. The petitioner is the decree-holder in Original Suit No. 87 of 1908 on the file of the Principal District Munsif of Salem, Property of the judgment-debtors was attached in execution of another decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE. Karunakaran Nair Vs. M. Krishna Menon and anr.
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, J.
Aug-18-1911
Limitation
(1913)ILR36Mad66
Abdur Rahim, J.1. This suit was to enforce payment of Rs. 54-7-10 due on a simple money bond and the question is whether it is barred. The bond provided for the payment of certain instalments and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »