Advanced Search Results

Deepak @ Oharilal Joshi, Aged About 20 Years, and ors. Vs. the State o ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Judge : A.H. Joshi; A.R. Joshi, JJ

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302; Evidence Act - Section 27; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 162

1. Present criminal appeal is preferred by all the six accused against the judgment and order of conviction passed by 3rd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur. The impugned judgment and order was passed in Sessions Trial...

Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judgment : ( Per: A.H.Joshi, J.) 1. Heard Shri V. D. Hon, learned Advocate holding for Shri U. N. Tripathi, Advocate for the Petitioner, Shri V. D. Godbharle, learned A. P. P. for Respondent Nos. 1...

Harish Gokuldas Kalantry and ors. Vs. Deepak Manohar Patil.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judgment : ( Per: A.H.Joshi, J.) 01. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard, by consent. 02. Heard both sides, and perused the record. 03. The parties herein have been litigating for considerably long time....

Johny at Abdul Rahim Khalil Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Subject : Right to Information

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per A.H.Joshi, J.) :- 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 3. The petitioner is a life convict. He had applied for parole. 4. The Divisional Commissioner had rejected his request, by...

Uttam Popat Chilgar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

ORAL JUDGMENT(PER:- A.R.JOSHI,J.) 1) Heard rival arguments for some time. Perused the judgment and order of conviction. Also perused the notes of evidence and the material produced before the learned Sessions Judge during the trial by...

Anil So Marotrao Dhongade. Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUDGMENT:( Per A.H.JOSHI, J.) 1. These appeals arise out of judgment and order of conviction and sentence awarded to ten accused persons, who were tried in Sessions Case No.57/2008 in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-II,...

Alkabai Yelanna Vaidu and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Judge : The Honourable Mrs. Justice V.K. Tahilramani &Amp; a.R. Joshi

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) 1. This appeal is preferred by the appellants - original accused Nos.1 and 2 against the judgment and order dated 27.6.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in...

Tanaji S/O Keshavrao Bhoite Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Collector, Jalgaon under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities and Slumlords and Bootleggers Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act 1981 ; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; Constitution of India. - Article 14, 21, 226

01. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard, by consent. 02. Petitioner herein is an elected director of Respondent No.5-Bank. He is under detention since 10.1.2011 in furtherance of the order passed by the Collector, Jalgaon...

Anil So Marotrao Dhongade Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. These appeals arise out of judgment and order of conviction and sentence awarded to ten accused persons, who were tried in Sessions Case No.57/2008 in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Nanded, passed on 10th...

Bhaskar Janardhan Salunke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A.H.Joshi; a.R.Joshi, Jj.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 436, 504, 436; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 313

1. Heard rival submissions on this appeal, preferred by the appellant/sole accused, challenging the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, dated 23.2.2010, in Sessions Case No.15 of 2008. 2....