Advanced Search Results
Sumanbai Bhaurao Shinde Vs. Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbha ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.V. Gangapurwala &Amp; a.M. Badar
Sep-11-2014
Land Acquisition
A.M. Badar, J. 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 2] The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunanda Bansi Koparge Vs. Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.V. Gangapurwala &Amp; a.M. Badar
Aug-05-2014
Education
A.M. Badar, J. 1. As the points for determination in the instant petitions filed by Sunanda Koparge are interlinked, all of them are being decided by this common judgment. 2. Facts necessary for deciding these petitions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaddasingh Antarlal Nat Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Naresh H. Patil &Amp; A.M. Badar
Apr-20-2016
Criminal
A.M. Badar, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner / accused is praying for quashing and setting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Annarao @ Pintu Baburao Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Naresh H. Patil &Amp; A.M. Badar
Apr-20-2016
Education
A.M. Badar, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. By the instant petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmardeep Singh Chudha and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anot ...
Mumbai
Naresh H. Patil &Amp; A.M. Badar
Mar-10-2016
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: (A.M. Badar, J.) 1. On oral prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.2 is allowed to be deleted at his risk. Heard. Rule. Rule, made returnable forthwith. By consent of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoyal Power Turnkey Implements Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorized Signat ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
R.M. Borde &Amp; a.M. Badar
Apr-29-2014
Land Acquisition
A.M. Badar, J. 1. Heard. Rule. With consent of parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. By the instant petition, the petitioner, which is a private limited Company, is praying for quashing and setting aside the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAurangabad Electrical Contractors Association, Through Its Authorized ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
R.M. Borde &Amp; a.M. Badar
Apr-10-2014
Land Acquisition
A.M. Badar, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and with consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 2. By the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmjad Khan Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary Departme ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S. Shinde &Amp; a.M. Badar
Feb-12-2015
Education
A.M. Badar, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the show cause notice dated 23.1.2014, issued by the respondent No.3, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Aurangabad, asking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash @ Jaywant Vasudeo Wankhede Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S. Shinde &Amp; a.M. Badar
Jan-13-2015
Education
A.M. Badar, J. 1. This is an application by appellant/accused under Section 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. for the sake of brevity) for recording of additional evidence of Sonali Manoj Deore mother...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatish Vs. The Union of India and Another
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.V. Gangapurwala &Amp; a.M. Badar
Oct-08-2014
Land Acquisition
A.M. Badar, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioner is praying for setting aside his order of termination of service and for directing the respondents to calculate his service as continuous service and to award all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »