Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: a h joshi · Page 1 of about 320 results (0.025 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 16 2011

Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Decided on : Sep-16-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judgment : ( Per: A.H.Joshi, J.) 1. Heard Shri V. D. Hon, learned Advocate holding for Shri U. N. Tripathi, Advocate for the Petitioner, Shri V. D. Godbharle, learned A. P. P. for Respondent Nos. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2011

Ashish Jagdishprasad Sharma Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A.M. Thipsay, JJ.

Decided on : Nov-25-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUDGMENT [PER A.H.JOSHI, J.]:- 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith, with the consent of parties. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. By these petitions, the petitioners have challenged F.I.R. Crime No.I-81, No.I-80,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2011

Shakuntalabai Wd/O Khairuprasad Joshi and anr. Vs. the State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A.H. Joshi; a.P Bhangale. Jj.

Decided on : Jan-06-2011

Subject : Criminal

: (PER A.P BHANGALE, J.):1. This Appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 15-04-1997 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Case No. 464 of 1992 whereby the appellant was convicted for offence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 03 2011

Harish Gokuldas Kalantry and ors. Vs. Deepak Manohar Patil.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Decided on : Oct-03-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judgment : ( Per: A.H.Joshi, J.) 01. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard, by consent. 02. Heard both sides, and perused the record. 03. The parties herein have been litigating for considerably long time....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2011

Anil So Marotrao Dhongade. Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Decided on : Oct-20-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUDGMENT:( Per A.H.JOSHI, J.) 1. These appeals arise out of judgment and order of conviction and sentence awarded to ten accused persons, who were tried in Sessions Case No.57/2008 in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-II,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2004

Vikram S/O Dhondu Awhale Since Deceased by Lrs. Subidrabai Wd/O Vikram ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A.H. Joshi, J.

Decided on : Jul-20-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58; Evidence Act - Sections 91, 92 and 92(6); Specific Relief Act

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR172; 2005(2)MhLj507

A.H. Joshi, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff who was successful in the trial Court, however, had failed in the 1st Appellate Court.2. The facts in brief as narrated in the plaint are that:--That...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2011

Shri V.S.Deshpande Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A.H.Joshi; a.R.Joshi, Jj.

Decided on : Oct-05-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard by Consent. 2. This Contempt proceedings are initiated on the Reference made to this Court by 5th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar. 3. In the proceedings for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2011

Johny at Abdul Rahim Khalil Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Decided on : Oct-04-2011

Subject : Right to Information

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per A.H.Joshi, J.) :- 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 3. The petitioner is a life convict. He had applied for parole. 4. The Divisional Commissioner had rejected his request, by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2011

Sow. Dhanabai W/O Hiraman Dasare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Decided on : Sep-22-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code. - Sections 448, 468, 471, 420, rw 34

1. The Petitioners herein have been named as accused in written F.I.R. lodged by Respondent No. 3 Rohini. It is registered with Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad, on 14.1.2010 under Crime No. I-18/2010 for offences punishable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2011

Kailas and All Ro Sonegaon, Tq.Jamkhed. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Judge : A. H. Joshi; A. R. Joshi, JJ.

Decided on : Oct-18-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 148, 149, 302, 341, 201, 395, 307; Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Section 3(1)(10)

1) The Appellants were tried in Sessions Case No.199/2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 148, 149, 302, 341, 201 of IPC read with Section 149 and also under Section 3(i)(x) of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial