Advanced Search Results

Madan Lal Vs. Competent Authority and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi857

T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal was filed by Madan Lal, a tenant, against the judgment of v. S. Deshpande, J. in Civil Writ Petition No 97 of 1968, pronounced on April 1, 1969, dismissing...

Rabinder Nath Malik Vs. Regional Passport Officer, New Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(1)D, 19(5), 21 and 226; Passport Act, 1920 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi1

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Gupta, ; S.N. Shankar and ; S.S. Jarate, Advs.

Dua, AG. C.J. (1). This petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution has been placed before us in pursuance of the referring order dated 4-11-1966 made by my learned brtoher S.K. Paur, J. Considering...

Tara Singh Harbhajan Singh and ors. Vs. Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 22 and 37(2)

Reported in : 9(1973)DLT456

S.N. Shankar, J. (1) This order will dispose of S. A. 0s. 38 of 1971, 39 of 1971 and 40 of 1971. (2) The appellants (hereafter called 'the tenants') in all these three appeals are in...

Vishendas Vs. the Administrator of the Union Territory of Delhi and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1963P& H492

Advocate for Respondent : Yogeshwar Dayal, Adv.

D.K. Mahajan, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and is directed against the order of the Administrator of the Union Territory of Delhi passed in appeal under...

R.S.G.R. Ram Chand and Sons Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 49; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR1974Delhi69; 10(1974)DLT21; 1973RLR205

Advocate for Respondent : Yogeshwar Dayal and ; Maheshwar Dayal, Advs.

S.N. Shankar, J.1. This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated March 4, 1971, rejecting the objections filed by Surrinder Lal during execution proceedings and directing the amount of...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Lala Jagannath Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995Supp(1)SCC282

Kuldip Singh and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. The Railway Board issued a circular dated 17-9-1965 wherein weightage - in respect of temporary service rendered by the officers - was provided on their permanent absorption in Class I...

Thiru A. Balakrishnan and anr. Vs. Govt. of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1955 - Rule 10(a)(i), 23

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC108

Kuldip Singh,; S.C. Agrawal and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. We issued notice in the review petition as Mr Chidambaram, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended that the view taken by us goes contrary to the ratio...

Administrator of the City of Nagpur Vs. Laxman and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Section 2(ia)

Reported in : 1995Supp(1)SCC247

K. Jayachandra Reddy and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This appeal against acquittal arises under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The whole question is whether the sample of cow milk is adulterated...

Bhagwanti and ors. Vs. Subordinate Services Selection Board, Haryana a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995Supp(2)SCC663

Kuldip Singh and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. Special leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The Subordinate Services Selection Board, Haryana selected 48 candidates for appointment as Lady Social Workers. Out of the selected...

Sandhya Rani Vs. Kalyanram Narayanan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC588

Kuldip Singh and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. We have heard the parties in person. Learned counsel for the parties have also assisted us. It is not disputed that the parties are living separately for the last more...