Advanced Search Results

Ircon International Limited vs.satya Prakash Builders Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Y.P. Narula, Mr. Aniruddha Choudhury, Mr. Abhey Narula, Mr. Shashank Katyayan

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 16, 2017. Date of decision: April 13, 2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 517/2016 IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .......Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr....

Simrin Singh vs.amrit Srinivasan & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Y.P. Narula, Mr. Abhey Narula, Mr. K.R. Chawla

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d January, 2018. SIMRIN SINGH CS(OS) 2258/2010 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Rishabh Bansal, Ms. Dakshaa Arora and Mr. Ajay...

Andritz Oy, Rep. Through Power of Attorney Agent, Mr. Siraj Ahmad Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(4), 7(5), 8, 11(6), 16, 16(1), 44 to 52, 53 and 54 - Schedule - Article 11(2) and 11(3); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(35), 3, 3(1), 26, 28, 31, 36, 39, 40, 79 and 82; Transfer of Property Act; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 7, 8(2) and 47(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 19, 19A, 20, 23 to 30, 35, 36 and 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 7, Rule 14(1); United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1985; United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Conciliation Rules, 1980; Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce Rules

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR545(Madras)

Advocate for Respondent : Y.P. Narula, Sr. Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;N. Ramakrishnan, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. This is an application taken out by the first defendant in the suit, under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to refer the parties to the present suit CS...

Pacific Convergence Cororation Ltd. Vs. Data Access (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Y.P. Narula, Mr. Aniruddh Chaudhary, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Ms. Manini Brar, Ms. Padma Priya, Mr. Mukesh Kamal, Ms. Meenakshi Sood, Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No. 292 of 2004 Reserved on: February 25, 2013 Decision on: March 12, 2013 PACIFIC CONVERGENCE CORPORATION LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Pall, Advocate. versus...

Avnija Ahluwalia (Minor) Through:next Friend Simra Vs. Vikaas Ahluwali ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Y.P. Narula, Mr. Aniruddha Chaudhary

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.1990/2011 AVNIJA AHLUWALIA (MINOR) THROUGH: NEXT FRIEND SIMRAN & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Prasoon Kumar & Mr....

iqbal Singh Marwah and anr. Vs. Meenakshi Marwah and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 195, 195(1), 195(4), 340, 340(1), 341, 343(2) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 172 to 188, 192, 193 to 196, 199, 200, 205 to 211, 420, 446, 463, 464, 465, 467, 468, 469, 471, 475, 476, 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Sections 195, 195(1), 476 and 476A; Finance Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR2005SC2119; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)717; 2005CriLJ2161; 118(2005)DLT329(SC); JT2005(3)SC195; 2005(3)MhLj530; 2005(II)OLR(SC)102; (2005)4SCC370; 2005(1)LC675(SC); [2005] 2 SCR 708

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Y.P. Narula

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.4111 of 2000.2. In view of conflict of opinion between two decisions of this Court each rendered by a bench of three learned Judges in Surjit...

Vikram R. Tikko Vs. Radhika Vikram Tikko

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)600; 65(1997)DLT735; 1997RLR27

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Y.P. Narula

Manmohan Sarin, J. (1) The applicant/husband is aggrieved by the order of this Court dated 30.10.1995, whereby Civil Revision No. 677/95 was allowed and the impugned order dated 14.8.1995 of the Additional District Judge, directing readmission...

Babusha International Vs. Canara Bank

Court : Delhi

Subject : Banking

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 21 and 35; Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi185; 151(2008)DLT560; 2008(105)DRJ497

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Batra and ; Y.P. Narula, Sr. Adv., ; Gautam Narula

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a sole proprietary concern of Shri Virender Khullar, challenges a letter dated 25th August, 2005 (hereafter 'the impugned letter')...

Ms Shoes East Ltd. and ors. Vs. Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19(8) and 19(9); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi51

Advocate for Respondent : Y.P. Narula, Adv.

Arun Kumar, J. 1. Rule D. B.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and with their consent, the matter is taken up for final disposal at this stage.3. This petition under...

Stick Travels (P) Ltd. Vs. Ethiopian Airlines

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2001(58)DRJ119

Advocate for Respondent : Y.P. Narula and ; V. Seshagiri, Advs.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The controversy that has arisen in this present dispute centres upon the interpretation that is to be given to Section 10 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Ethiopian Airlines had appointed Messers Stic Travels...