Advanced Search Results

Bhushan Kumar Dewan Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 226

Reported in : 84(2000)DLT679

Advocate for Respondent : Y.P. Ahuja, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 6 and ; A.B. Dayal, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5

Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 22.3.1997 passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi in Probate Case No. 566/ 94 dismissing the petition for grant of probate/letter of...

Sudershan Kumar JaIn Vs. Sh. Kuldip Kumar JaIn and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Y.P. Ahuja, Ms. Anshu Aggarwal, Mr. Rahul Srivastava, Ms. Suparna Srivatava

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2013. % + CS(OS) 1088/2008 SUDERSHAN KUMAR JAIN Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. T.K. Tiwari & Mr. Shakti Kant Patnaik, Advs. Versus...

Shri Prem Sarup Vs. Savitri Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 97(2002)DLT737

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Singh Kalra, Adv.

R.C. Jain, J.1. This civil revision is directed against the order of the learned Additional District Judge dated 29th January, 2002 by which an application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC moved...

Mrs. Teeku Dutta Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 112; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151; Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi205; 2004(73)DRJ9

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Sharma, Adv.

R.C. Jain, J. 1. This civil revision is directed against the order of learned Administrative Civil Judge, Delhi, dated 20.12.1999 thereby allowing an application under Section 151 CPC filed by the objector Banarsi Dass seeking the...

Smt. Manorma Grover and Others Vs. Smt. Ishwari Devi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1381/2009 % Order dated 03.02.2014 SMT. MANORMA GROVER & OTHERS Through : ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Y.P. Ahuja, Adv. along with plaintiffs no.1 and 3....

Pritam Chand JaIn Vs. Bir Kumar and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT640; 2000(54)DRJ863

Advocate for Respondent : Sh. J.K. Seth, Sr. Advocate, ; Sh. Mohinder Rana and ; Sh.

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Plaintiff filed this suit, inter alia, alleging that he became member of Vardhman Cooperative House Building Society, Kamla Nagar, Delhi in the year 1966 and against payment of Rs.14,155.40 from time to time...

D.A. Shahni Vs. H.D. Mehra

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13; Evidence Act - Sections 17

Reported in : 1979RLR204

Rajindar Sachar, J.(1) This is a tenant's second appeal against the order of the Rent Control Tribunal and Controller by which they refused to set aside the ex parte eviction order passed against the appellant. (2)...

Ram Beti Vs. Sumesh Prashad

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)454; 65(1997)DLT125; 1996(39)DRJ799; 1997RLR151

Lokeshwar Prasad, J. (1) The present petition, filed by the petitioners, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order passed by Shri H.S. Sharma, Additional Rent Controller, Delhi on 2.12.95 and...

M/S Dhootapapeshwar Industries Vs. Sh. Atma Ram and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 06.01.2012. + CM(M) No. 128/2007 and CM No.1091/2007 (for stay) M/S DHOOTAPAPESHWAR INDUSTRIES LTD. ...........Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.P. Ahuja, Advocate. Versus SH....

Krishan Lal Kumar vs.medical Council of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:06. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 7097/2013 KRISHAN LAL KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ...........