Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: winnie coutinho · Page 1 of about 30 results (0.023 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 2002

Vikram Reddy, Presently Lodged at Central Jail, Aguada, Sinquerim, Bar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 22 and 50

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)499; (2002)2BOMLR768

Advocate for Respondent : Winnie Coutinho, Additional Public Prosecutor

P.V. Hardas, J.1. The Appellant, who stands convicted for anoffence punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii) and 22 of theN.D.P.S. Act, 1985, and is sentenced to undergo RigorousImprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine ofRs.1,00,000/-, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2001

Dayanand Ramahaskutti S/O. Ramahaskutti Vs. State (Through Public Pros ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-18-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279, 304A and 337; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235 and 397

Reported in : 2001(5)BomCR902

Advocate for Respondent : Winnie Coutinho, A.P.P.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Irshad Agha, Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent.2. The Revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th January, 2000 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2006

Raghuvir Dessai Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 26, 28 and 313

Reported in : 2007CriLJ829

Advocate for Respondent : Winnie Coutinho, Public Prosecutor

N.A. Britto, J.1. This appeal is by the accused who has been convicted and sentenced under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f), IPC by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Margao.2. The accused was a watchman of a Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 2005

Valeriano Barretto Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-2005

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 309

Reported in : 2006(3)MhLj393

Advocate for Respondent : Winnie Coutinho, P.P.

ORDERN.A. Britto, J.1. Rule.2. Heard forthwith.3. Heard Ms. Asha Desai, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Winnie Coutinho, the learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State/respondent.4. The petitioner herein is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2001

Rajendra Naik Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-27-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107 and 306

Reported in : I(2002)DMC38

Advocate for Respondent : Winnie Coutinho, A.P.P.

P.V. Hardas, J.1. The appellant stands convicted, for an offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and for payment of fine of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2008

State Through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Bombay at Panaji Vs. An ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 172 and 313

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1355

Advocate for Respondent : P.P. Singh, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 4, ;T. Geoge John, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and ;Asha Dessai, Adv. U/LAS for respondent No. 3

R.C. Chavan, J.1. This appeal by State is directed against acquittal by the learned IIIrd Asistant Session Judge,South Goa, Margao, of five respondents tried before him for offence of Dacoity punishable under Section 395 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2005

Sangeeta Peplo Gaude and ors. Vs. Tulshidas Bablo Gad and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-2005

Subject : Election

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR242

Advocate for Respondent : A.F. Diniz, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;Winnie Coutinho, Adv. for respondent Nos. 3 and 4

Lavande A.P., J.1. Rule. Mr. Diniz waives notice on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Ms. Coutinho, Government Advocate waives notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Respondent No. 2 is a formal party....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2005

Sinero Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissio ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-04-2005

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7B

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR171; [2005(106)FLR606]; (2005)IIILLJ586Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Winnie Coutinho, Adv.

Lavande A.P., J.1. Rule. Ms. Coutinho, waives notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent heard forthwith.2. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 30th December, 2004, passed by respondent No. 2 dismissing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2006

Shanaz D' Souza Vs. Sheikh Ameer Saheeb and Anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-19-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118, 118(B), 138, 139 and 142; Contract Act - Sections 183; ;Evidence Act - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2007(2)BomCR362; 2007(3)MhLj324

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kakodkar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;Winnie Coutinho, P.P. for Respondent No. 2

N.A. Britto, J.1. This is complainant's appeal filed against the acquittal of the accused, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act, for short) by Order dated 30-12-2004 of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2001

Khemlo Sakharam Sawant Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-08-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 437; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 12

Reported in : 2001BomCR(Cri)761a; (2001)2BOMLR875a

Advocate for Respondent : Winnie Coutinho, A.P.P.

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Heard both sides.2. This application takes exception to the order passed by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji dated May 5, 2001, rejecting the application for bail preferred by the applicant herein.3. Briefly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial