Advanced Search Results

Vasant Rajaram Narvekar, Since Deceased by His Legal Heirs Vs. Ankusha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 61, 102 and 114; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6 and 123; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 18 and 19

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR196

Advocate for Respondent : Narendra V. Walawalkar and ;P.L. Naik, Adv.

S.D. Pandit, J.1. Shri Vasant Rajaram Narvekar, the original plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 71 of 1975 on the file of Civil Judge Junior Division. Malvan. District - Sindhudurga has preferred this Second Appeal against...

Gangabai W/O Bala Kada by Jer Jeors and Legal Representative Vs. Jagan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR321

Advocate for Respondent : Narendra V. Walawalkar, Adv.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. Gangabai Kadam, an aged widow (since deceased) filed a civil suit in the year 1976 for (i) a declaration of title to half portion of the house property where she was residing and...

Procter and Gamble India Limited and anr. Vs. the Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 217; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR403

Advocate for Respondent : N.V. Walawalkar and ;G.V. Murthi, Advs.

A.V. Savant, J.1. The first petitioner Procter & Gamble India Limited is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The second petitioner is its shareholder. By this petition, the petitioners seek to challenge the letter...

Mangaldas N. Verma Charitable Trust by It Managing Trustee, Mrs. Sarla ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 2(1), 2(10), 8, 9, 33, 127, 139, 154, 154(1); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 5(10) and 11

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR405; 2006(5)BomCR342; 2006(3)MhLj662

Advocate for Respondent : N.V. Walawalkar, Adv.

K.J. Rohee, J.1. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the dismissal of Municipal Appeal No.186 of 1986 under section 2(1)(ix) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 by the Additional Chief Judge, Bombay by order...

Radhabai Balasaheb Shirke (Since Deceased, Through Her Heirs and L.Rs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8 to 10, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 16; Hindu Womens Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 3(4); ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70 and 72; Hindu Succession (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR823; 2007(5)BomCR324

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Kumbhakoni and ;Gauri Godse, Advs. for Respondent No. 1, ;R.D. Soni, Adv., i/b., Ram and Co. for Respondent No. 2 and ;Abhijit B. Kadam, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. This Second Appeal raises a short yet important question of law, 'whether a daughter could acquire any right, either limited or absolute, by inheritenance prior to coming into force of the Hindu...

Laxmibai Ramji (Since Deceased) and ors. Vs. Khimji Palan (Since Decea ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : AIR2001Bom3; 2000(3)ALLMR314

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Abhyankar, Adv.

ORDERJ.N. Patel, J. 1. The petitioners -- original plaintiffs are trustees of Shah Ramji Ravji Sojpal Trust Estate which owns a building known as 'Ramji Sojpal Building' situate at Junction of S. K. Bole Road and...

Shri Parshuram Prabhakar Uparkar Vs. Shri Tukaram Bhagwan Barde and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4 and 4(1); Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rule 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR501; 2006(5)MhLj598

Advocate for Respondent : Y.S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Adv., ;G.S. Godbole and ;Nitin Mulay, Advs. for Respondent No. 14 and ;S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 29 and 32

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Rule2. Learned Counsel for the Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule made returnable and heard forthwith so as to decide both the petitions at the stage of admission. 3. By these petitions, the...

Philomena John D'souza and Ors. Vs. Brij Bihari Nayar and Ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1994)96BOMLR929

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Walawalkar

Bhimrao N. Naik, J.1. Heard both sides. This is defendants' appeal challenging the order passed in Notice of Motion No. 3446 of 1991 in S.C. Suit No. 4387 of 1991 whereby the motion taken out by...

Union Bank of India Vs. Byram Pestonji Gariwala and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 47 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 4, Order 21, Rules 22 and 23(1) - Order 23, Rule 3, Order 43, Rules 1A(2) and Order 23, Rules 3 and 3A - Order LXIII; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409, 467 and 477A

Reported in : AIR1991Bom185; 1991(1)BomCR575; (1991)93BOMLR944; 1991(1)MhLj104

Advocate for Respondent : V.T. Walawalkar, ;Mrs. C.D. Shenoi, ;Mrs. Tasneem Khan and ;Miss Geeta R. Shastri, Advs.

This Chamber Summons involves certain interesting and important questions of law. The questions involved in this proceeding for consideration of the Court are as under:(1) Whether the consent decree is a nullity in case the consent...

Sajeda Nihal Ahmed Vs. Malegaon Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ElectionCivil

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 2(29), 10(1) and 12(1); Constitution of India - Article 243V(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 353, 504 and 506

Reported in : AIR2005Bom81; 2005(1)ALLMR864; 2005(1)BomCR142; 2005(1)MhLj87

Advocate for Respondent : N.V. Walawalkar and ;S.M. Sabrad, Advs. for Respondents 1 and 2 and ;P.I. Khemani, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P. No. 2465 of 2004 with Civil Appln. Nos. 1839 and 1840 of 2004

ORDERA.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties.2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Mr. Sabrad waives notice for respondents 1 and 2 in Writ Petition No. 2465/04 and Civil Application No. 1839/04 and...