Advanced Search Results

Brijlal Patel and ors. Vs. Managing Director, M.P. Hastashilp Vikas Ni ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1998(1)MPLJ236

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Mishra, Adv.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.1. In all these petitions common questions of law and fact arise and as such they are being disposed of by this common order.2. The Government of India, in order to increase the production...

Union of India and ors. Vs. Vartak Labour Union.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21

1. Challenge in these appeals, by special leave, is to the judgments and orders dated 27th March, 2001 and 22nd January, 2003 delivered by a Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court at Guwahati in Writ...

Vhcpl-adcc Pingalai Infrastrcutres Pvt Ltd and anr. Vs Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 2,4, 48; Electricity Supply Act - Sections 43, 43A; National Highway Authority of India Act, 1982 (NHAI Act, 1982 hereafter) - Sections 3, 11

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G. E. Vahanvati, Attorney, Mr. Atul Nanda, Mr. Jatan Singh, Mr. Rahul Malik, Mr. Vivek Tankha, Mr. Rishabh Sancheti , Ms. Meenakshi Sood, Mr. Shivaji, Advs..

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. "A mans greed...

A.K. Shrivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 74, 74(1), 74(2), 74(3) and 74(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 309, 310 and 323A; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT1

Advocate for Respondent : Vivek Tankha and ;Ravindra Shrivastava, Adv. Generals, ;Ajay Mishra, Dy. Adv. General and ;R.S. Patel, Adv.

ORDERS.S. Saraf, J. 1. The factual matrix and the question of law involved being similar, this petition and the following petitions were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. (i) W.P. No....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Rameshwar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalTrusts and Societies

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 74 to 76 and 87; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 21, 120B, 409, 418, 419 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -Sections 227, 228, 397, 401 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 142 and 226

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2415; JT2009(5)SC171; 2009(5)SCALE214; (2009)11SCC424:2009AIRSCW2616:2009(3)LHSC1563

Advocate for Respondent : Vivek Tankha, Sr. Adv., ; Sushil Kumar Jain, ; Gurleen Chhabra

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted in both the special leave petitions which are taken up for hearing and final disposal together.2. The respondents were Directors of the Indore Premier Co-operative Bank Limited and were also members...

Shri Narmada Enterprises and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 and 34; Constitution of India - Article 226; Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR420(MP); 2003(1)MPHT515; 2003(1)MPLJ511

Advocate for Respondent : Vivek Tankha, Sr. Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ;S.C. Sharma, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERArun Mishra, J. 1. Petitioners are assailing the award (P-4) dated 24-12-2001 which has been made a Rule of the Court by Vth A.D.J., Bhopal as per order P-5. Main challenge is on the ground that...

Gajanand and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 5A; Constitution of India - Article 166

Reported in : AIR2000MP2

Advocate for Respondent : Vivek Tankha, Adv. General and ;D.D. Vyas, AAG

Khan, J.1. One LPA and these petitions involve similar questions of law and fact and are disposed off by this common judgment. Even though, writ petitioners are represented by more than one counsel. Shri M.M. Asudani...

The Associated Journals Ltd & Anr vs.land & Development Office

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Tushar Mehta

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:28. h February, 2019 + LPA102019 & CM Nos. 566/2019 & 649/20 1. THE ASSOCIATED JOURNALS LTD & ANR...

State of Rajasthan Vs. A.N. Mathur and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8469 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP (C) No.12350 of 2013) State of Rajasthan …APPELLANT VERSUS A.N. Mathur & Ors. ....RESPONDENTS WITH C.A.No.8470/2013 @ SLP(C)No.12351/2013,...

Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi. Vs. M/S Hari Chand Shri Gop ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

1. The question that falls for consideration in these appeals is whether a manufacturer of a specified final product falling under the schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short "the Tariff Act") is...