Advanced Search Results
Raghuvir Singh Vs. Raj Kumar and ors.
Allahabad
May-03-2002
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)
2002(3)AWC1955
Vishnu Sahai and ;H.S.N. Tripathi, Advs. and ;B. Dayal, S.C.
Anjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Shri P.N. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vishnu Sahai and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi for the contesting respondents.2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-tenant seeking quashing of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExecutive Engineer, Tubewell Division Vs. Ram Sajan Shukla and ors.
Allahabad
May-19-2004
ServiceConstitution
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 79; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5
2004(3)AWC2619
Vishnu Sahai and ;B. Dayal, Advs. and ;R.S. Shukla, S.C.
Umeshwar Pandey, J.1. The respondent No. 1 Ram Sajan Shukla had challenged the order dated 14.10.1985, passed by the respondent No. 4 rejecting his candidature for promotion on the post of Junior Engineer in the department.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagar Palika Parishad, Through Its Executive Officer and Executive Off ...
Allahabad
Aug-29-2008
Service
[2008(119)FLR412]
Shri. Vishnu Sahai
Prakash Krishna, J.1. Raising a somewhat interesting question the present writ petition has been filed. The question involved in the present petition is regarding the applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Firm Jawahar Lal Sundar Lal Vs. Firm Jagdish Rai Baij Nath
Allahabad
Aug-04-1950
CivilArbitration
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10 and 115; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 23 and 25
AIR1951All335
B.K. Dhaon and ;M.L. Trivedi, Advs.
Misra, J.1. These revisions are directed against two orders passed by the Munsif of Ramsanehighat, Bara Banki. By the first order dated 20th August 1948, he dismissed the objections of the defendant (firm Jawahar Lal Sundar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamal D/O Bansidhar Ghatol Vs. Sawate Education Society and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-19-2005
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9, 9(1) and 9(2); Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 - Rules 2, 3, 3(3) and 8(1); Service Law
2006(2)ALLMR64; 2006(2)MhLj675
M.G. Bhangde, Adv. for respondent No. 3 and ;T.R. Kankale, AGP for respondent Nos. 4 and 5
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition, filed by employee of a Private School, is to the judgment dated 30-4-1994 delivered by respondent No. 5 School Tribunal in an appeal under Section 9 of Maharashtra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Kailas Laxman Joshi Vs. B. Akashi Commissioner of Police, Thane an ...
Mumbai
Jun-16-1994
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 38, 383 and 384
1994(4)BomCR147; 1995CriLJ231
Mrs. B.B. Desai, A.P.P. and ;J.C. Satpute, Adv.
Rane, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has challenged the detention order dated 8-2-1994 issued and served by the 1st respondent, Commissioner of Police, Thane in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Poonam W/O Pandharinath Laxman Waringe Vs. Shri B.S. Mohite and o ...
Mumbai
Oct-29-1999
Criminal
(2000)102BOMLR605
D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Petitioner is the wife of the detenu who is detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers and Drug-offenders Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the 'M.P.D.A. Act'). Grounds of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradip Bhikaji Satam Vs. S.M. Shangari and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-23-2002
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2 and 3(1)
2002BomCR(Cri)602; 2002CriLJ1715; 2002(2)MhLj162
D.S. Mhaispurkar, A.P.P.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu Pradip Bhikaji Satam has impugned the order dated 10-10-2001 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModaram Purohit Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-12-1999
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 4, 8, 22 and 33; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Indian Opium Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 395 and 425
1999(5)BomCR595; 1999BomCR(Cri)595; (1999)3BOMLR40; 2000CriLJ473; 1999(2)MhLj719
Mrs. J.S. Pawar, A.P.P.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This is an application for bail by Modaram J. Purohit, Original Accused No. 2, who was tried along with six others by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammad Hasan Khan Vs. Mohammad Majidulla and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-24-2002
Service
2002(4)ALLMR512; (2002)104BOMLR544
B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. The appellant was initially appointed in a Primary School run by the present respondent No. 2 Madarse Madinatual Uloom as Assistant Teacher on 16th June, 1975, though untrained with S.S.C. qualifications. He was,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »