Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vishnu sahai · Page 1 of about 443 results (0.083 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 03 2002

Raghuvir Singh Vs. Raj Kumar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-03-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1955

Advocate for Respondent : Vishnu Sahai and ;H.S.N. Tripathi, Advs. and ;B. Dayal, S.C.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Shri P.N. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vishnu Sahai and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi for the contesting respondents.2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-tenant seeking quashing of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2004

Executive Engineer, Tubewell Division Vs. Ram Sajan Shukla and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 79; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2619

Advocate for Respondent : Vishnu Sahai and ;B. Dayal, Advs. and ;R.S. Shukla, S.C.

Umeshwar Pandey, J.1. The respondent No. 1 Ram Sajan Shukla had challenged the order dated 14.10.1985, passed by the respondent No. 4 rejecting his candidature for promotion on the post of Junior Engineer in the department.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2008

Nagar Palika Parishad, Through Its Executive Officer and Executive Off ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-29-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR412]

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Vishnu Sahai

Prakash Krishna, J.1. Raising a somewhat interesting question the present writ petition has been filed. The question involved in the present petition is regarding the applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 1950

Firm Jawahar Lal Sundar Lal Vs. Firm Jagdish Rai Baij Nath

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-04-1950

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10 and 115; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 23 and 25

Reported in : AIR1951All335

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Dhaon and ;M.L. Trivedi, Advs.

Misra, J.1. These revisions are directed against two orders passed by the Munsif of Ramsanehighat, Bara Banki. By the first order dated 20th August 1948, he dismissed the objections of the defendant (firm Jawahar Lal Sundar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2005

Kamal D/O Bansidhar Ghatol Vs. Sawate Education Society and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9, 9(1) and 9(2); Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 - Rules 2, 3, 3(3) and 8(1); Service Law

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR64; 2006(2)MhLj675

Advocate for Respondent : M.G. Bhangde, Adv. for respondent No. 3 and ;T.R. Kankale, AGP for respondent Nos. 4 and 5

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition, filed by employee of a Private School, is to the judgment dated 30-4-1994 delivered by respondent No. 5 School Tribunal in an appeal under Section 9 of Maharashtra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1994

Smt Kailas Laxman Joshi Vs. B. Akashi Commissioner of Police, Thane an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-16-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 38, 383 and 384

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR147; 1995CriLJ231

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. B.B. Desai, A.P.P. and ;J.C. Satpute, Adv.

Rane, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has challenged the detention order dated 8-2-1994 issued and served by the 1st respondent, Commissioner of Police, Thane in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1999

Smt. Poonam W/O Pandharinath Laxman Waringe Vs. Shri B.S. Mohite and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-29-1999

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (2000)102BOMLR605

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Petitioner is the wife of the detenu who is detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers and Drug-offenders Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the 'M.P.D.A. Act'). Grounds of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2002

Pradip Bhikaji Satam Vs. S.M. Shangari and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-23-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2 and 3(1)

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)602; 2002CriLJ1715; 2002(2)MhLj162

Advocate for Respondent : D.S. Mhaispurkar, A.P.P.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu Pradip Bhikaji Satam has impugned the order dated 10-10-2001 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1999

Modaram Purohit Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 4, 8, 22 and 33; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Indian Opium Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 395 and 425

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR595; 1999BomCR(Cri)595; (1999)3BOMLR40; 2000CriLJ473; 1999(2)MhLj719

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. J.S. Pawar, A.P.P.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This is an application for bail by Modaram J. Purohit, Original Accused No. 2, who was tried along with six others by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2002

Mohammad Hasan Khan Vs. Mohammad Majidulla and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-24-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR512; (2002)104BOMLR544

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. The appellant was initially appointed in a Primary School run by the present respondent No. 2 Madarse Madinatual Uloom as Assistant Teacher on 16th June, 1975, though untrained with S.S.C. qualifications. He was,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial