Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vipin sinha · Page 1 of about 49 results (0.024 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 12 2005

Krishna Kumar Vs. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Dying in Harness Rules, 1974

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC608; [2005(104)FLR980]; (2005)2UPLBEC1603

Advocate for Respondent : Vipin Sinha, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The father of the petitioner was a Class IV employee of the respondent-State Bank of India. He died in harness on 28.3.2000. Immediately thereafter the petitioner filed an application for appointment on compassionate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2005

State Bank of India Through Its Deputy General Manager Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-18-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 33C(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC299; [2006(107)FLR898]; (2006)ILLJ625All

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Singh, ;T.N. Singh and ;Bal Mukund, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. This is the third inning of litigation between the panics, cause of action of which arose in the year' 1969.2. Brief facts of this case as admitted to the parties are that respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2002

Banaras Beads Limited Vs. Prashant Glass Works Private Limited

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434(1)

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas339(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. This creditors-winding up petition has been filed by Banaras Beads Limited, A-1, Industrial Estate, Varanasi, to wind up Prashant Glass Works Private Limited, with its registered office at Motiwala Industrial Estate, P. O....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 11 2002

Debi Das (Deceased) and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-11-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2003All14; 2003(3)AWC1921

Advocate for Respondent : Vipin Sinha and ;Devendra Pratap Singh, Advs.

ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. The property in dispute is site No. 48, Civil Lines, Allahabad having an area of 14,400 sq. yards, on the portion of which bungalow No. 17/27, Elgin Road and 1 Stretchy Road exist....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2005

Habib Sheikh Son of Nathoo Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary, Depart ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-23-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindary Abolition and Land Reforms Act; Uttar Pradesh Zamindary Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 282; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60(1) - Order 21, Rules 64, 74 to 81 and 84

Reported in : AIR2005All270; 2005(3)AWC2566

Advocate for Respondent : Vipin Sinha, Adv. and ;S.C.

Krishna Murari, J. 1. Heard Sri Y.S. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vipin Sinha for the respondent No. 3.2. Proceedings initiated by the respondent No. 3 bank for recovery of loan amount was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2000

Camphor Factory Karamchari Sangh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-17-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Factories Act, 1948; Industrial Housing Act, 1955

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC985; [2000(85)FLR111]; (2000)IILLJ713All; (2000)1UPLBEC708

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;Pradeep Kumar, ;Nawin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.

D. S. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri K. M. L. Hajela, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Vinay Malaviya. the learned standing counsel of the State of U. P., representing the respondent Nos. 1,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2003

Umesh Chandra Pathak Vs. Chief Manager, Sbi, Bareilly Zone and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-23-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR1047]; (2003)IIILLJ84All; (2003)2UPLBEC1824

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Sinha, ;Vipin Sinha and ;G.C. Bhattacharya, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Navin Sinha assisted by Sri Vipin Sinha for the respondents. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and with the consent of the learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2004

Subhash Chandra Yadav Vs. State Bank of India and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-05-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ277All; (2004)3UPLBEC2926

Advocate for Respondent : Vipin Sinha, Adv. and ;S.C.

M. Katju and Umeshwar Pandey, JJ.1. This Special Appeal has been filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 17.7.2001 by which he has dismissed the Writ Petition.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

In Re: Banaras Beads Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 87, 176, 391, 393, 394, 397 and 398; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 34 and 36

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas548(All); (2006)6CompLJ342(All); [2006]72SCL178(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri R. P. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner companies and Shri Navin Sinha, senior advocate assisted by Shri Vipin Sinha for Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, the objector to the scheme of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2002

Govind Ballabh Joshi Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR874]; (2002)IILLJ272All; (2002)2UPLBEC1084

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Dwivedi, Adv. and ;Vipin Sinha, Standing Counsel

S.K. Sen, C.J. and R.K. Agarwal, J.1. Heard Sri Bhoopencira Nath Singh learned counsel for appellant and Sri R.C. Dwivedi for respondents No. 3 and Sri Vipin Sinha learned Standing counsel for State Bank of India.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial