Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vinod swaroop · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 02 2011

Satya Prakash Pandey and Others Vs. Dev Brat Mishra

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-02-2011

Subject : Election

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Mishra; Vinod Swaroop, Advs

1. This is a First Appeal From Order under Order XLIII Rule 1(w) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. Heard Sri Yogesh Agarwal, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Vinod Swaroop, learned senior counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2003

Bench Secretaries, Brotherhood High Court and Ors. Vs. State of U.P. a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-20-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Allahabad High Court (Condition of Service of Staff) Rules, 1946; Allahabad High Court Officers and Staff (Condition of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1976 - Rules 8, 11, 16, 18, 40, 41 and 42; Allahabad High Court Officers and Staff (Condition of Service and Conduct) (Amendment) Rules, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 229(2)

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2138

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swaroop, Addl. Adv. General, ;M.S. Pipersenia, ;K.R. Sirohi, ;H.R. Mishra, ;J.N. Maurya and ;Sudhir Agarwal, Advs. and ;S.C

A.K. Yog. J.1. Sri S.C. Budhwar, Senior Advocate and Sri Shailendra, Advocate on behalf of the petitioners; Sri Vinod Swaroop, Addl. Advocate General assisted by Sri M.S. Pipersenia, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 1,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1996

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. U.P. Small Industries Corporation Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-03-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964

Reported in : [1996]221ITR847(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swaroop, Adv.

1. This is an income-tax reference under Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in which the following two questions have been referred for our opinion :' 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 12 2000

Abdul Wahid Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-12-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Meat Food Product Order, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC1866

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swaroop, Adv. and ;Addl. A.G.

Binod Kumar Roy and K. D, Shahi, JJ.1. The writ-petitioner has come up with following prayers :(i) To command respondent Nos. 2 to 7 not to Interfere with his right to carry on business, of slaughtering...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2001

Pradeep Kumar Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-30-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC255; [2002(92)FLR785]; (2002)1UPLBEC719

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swaroop, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Vinod Swaroop, learned counsel representing the respondents.2. Petitioner by means of this writ petition has prayed for issuance of a writ,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1999

Mishra Brothers and Another Vs. State of U. P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-23-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(1) and (2), 5 and 6; Petroleum Act, 1934; Petroleum Rules, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Kerosene Control Order, 1962; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC2775

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swaroop, Addl. A.G.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J. 1. Petitioners of this petition have challenged the legality of the Government Orders dated 13.4.1998 and 30.1.1999 Annexures 1 and 3 respectively to the writ petition, by all the wholesale dealers of superior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2002

Naveen Gun House and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-13-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 246; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 13 and 16; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 38A

Reported in : AIR2003All187; 2003(2)AWC894; (2003)1UPLBEC709

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swaroop, ;Sanjay Goswami, ;S.N. Srivastava and ;C.S. Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

N.K. Mehrotra, J.1. This is writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India for a writ of certiorari declaring Indian Stamp (U. P. Second Amendment) Act, 1997 (U. P. Act No. 23 of 1998 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2001

Ram Nihor Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-18-2001

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1630; (2001)2UPLBEC1523

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swaroop, Adv. and ;S.C.

A.K. Yog, J.1. A short counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of all the respondents. Learned counsels for all the parties agreed that the case may be finally heard and decided at the admission stage as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2004

Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-22-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Central Board of Secondary Education Examination Rules - Rule 14(4)

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC2888

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Singh, S.S.C., ; H.N. Pandey and ; Vinod Swaroop, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Uma Nath Pandey on behalf of the petitioner. Nobody is present on behalf of the Union of India. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are represented by Sri Vinod Swaroop.2. On behalf...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1997

Deepak Kumar Agrawal Vs. Registrar, High Court of Judicature at Allaha ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-26-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules - Rule 5; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24(1) and 29(2); All India Bar Council Rules - Rule 49; Constitution of India - Articles 124, 217 to 224A and 233 to 237

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC530

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

Palok Basu and M. L. Singhal, JJ.1. Those who have the fortune of being personally acquainted with the honourable profession of law are perhaps at an advantageous position to appreciate the opportunities it provides, and sometimes...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial