Advanced Search Results

Delhi Development Authority Vs. the Archaeological Survey of India and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 - Sections 19(1) and 30(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules, 1959 - Rules 10(1) and 33(1)

Reported in : 2003(68)DRJ298

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Jain, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. Rule. With the consent of the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. This writ petition challenges the Order dated 14th November, 2002, passed by the Office of the...

State of Punjab Vs. Mohinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Punjab Civil Service Rules - Rule 2.5; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 35

Reported in : AIR2005SC1868; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)505; 2005(2)AWC1009(SC); 2005(1)BLJR823; (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN155; 100(2005)CLT357(SC); 2005(2)CTC828; JT2005(3)SC220; 2005(2)KLT126(SC); (2005

Advocate for Respondent : Nidhesh Gupta, ; Vinod Shukla and ; S. Janani, Advs.

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant-State calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the Second Appeal filed by it under Section 100...

Tarlochan Dev Sharma Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 16(1) and (2) and 22; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1)

Reported in : AIR2001SC2524; JT2001(5)SC645; 2001(4)SCALE472; (2001)6SCC260; [2001]3SCR1146

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Sharma, ; Mr. Vinod Shukla, ; Mr. A. Mariarputha

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. The appellant was elected a Councillor of Rajpura Municipal Council in January, 1998. In the month of April, 1998, he was elected as President of Municipality. He had held the office hardly for...

Punjab Water Supply Sewerage Board and anr. Vs. Ram Sajivan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 3, 4, 11A and 12; Motor Vehicles Act; Railway Servants Rules, 1968 - Rules 9 to 13 and 14; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 141, 142 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR(SC)798; [2007(113)FLR1172]; [2007(4)JCR26(SC)]; (2007)IIILLJ156SC; 2007(6)SCALE276; (2007)9SCC86

Advocate for Respondent : Nidhesh Gupta, ; Vinod Shukla and ; S. Janani, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These two appeals by special leave involving common question of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. Respondents...

Punjab State Warehousing Corp., Chandigarh Vs. Manmohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Punjab Warehousing Corporation Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 162 and 309

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR218]; JT2007(4)SC291; (2007)2LLJ519SC; 2007(3)SCALE401; (2007)9SCC337; 2008(1)SLJ292(SC); 2007AIRSCW6301; 2007-II-LLJ-519(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Nidhesh Gupta, ; Vinod Shukla, ; J. Goel and ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The State of Punjab formulated a scheme on 23.01.2001 for regularisation of its employees. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal arising out of a judgment and order dated...

Food Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Harmesh Chand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3923(SC); 2006(9)SCALE78; (2006)7SCC654; (2007)7MLJ687

Advocate for Respondent : Nidesh Gupta, ; Vinod Shukla and ; S. Janani, Advs.

1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. The High Court by its impugned judgment and order issued a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated January 17, 2003 whereby the contract of the respondent herein...

Amar Deep Singh Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 70, 213(2) and 277; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 10 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi190; 2005(85)DRJ179

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Shukla, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

R.C. Jain, J.1. The petitioner, above-named, has filed this petition for grant of probate of registered Will dated 8.11.1977 executed by Col.Iqbal Singh, AVSM, MC, M-in-D (Retd.), who is stated to have died at Panchkula, Haryana...

Sebi Vs. Shri Jayendra K. Shukla and ors.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

1.1 Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) noticed substantial increase in the volume and price of the shares of Ojas Technochem Products Limited (hereinafter referred to as OTPL) at the Bombay...

Sebi Vs. Shri Shailesh Jhaveri and Smt.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

1.1 The facts in so far as they are relevant to the present proceedings are stated herein under. Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) noticed substantial increase in the volume/price in...

Mohd. HusaIn Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Charu Dalal, Mr. Saleem Ahmed

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) NO.102 OF 200.Decided on :5. h March, 2013 MOHD. HUSAIN Through: Petitioner Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate. Versus STATE OF DELHI Through: Respondent Ms. Charu Dalal,...