Advanced Search Results
Virendra Prakash Madnawat Vs. Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-16-2002
Civil
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35
AIR2003All122
Sudhir Agarwal and ;Vinod Misra, Advs.
1. This writ petition has been filed against the U,P, Power Corporation. Earlier the counsel for the U.P. Power Corporation was Sri Sudhir Agarwal but now the U.P, Power Corporation has appointed Sri Vinod Misra as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-11-2003
CivilProperty
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4(1), 5A, 6, 7 and 48; Constitution of India - Article 226
(2003)2UPLBEC1817
Vinod Misra, Adv. for the NOIDA and ;S.C. for the respondents Nos. 1 and 2
M. Katju, J. 1. This writ petition and Writ Petition Nos. 29029, 29033 and 29152 of 2003, are being disposed off by a common judgment.2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel, and Shri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil Ahmed Vs. Industrial Development Commissioner and Principal Secr ...
Allahabad
Jul-03-2002
Service
2002(3)AWC2357; [2002(94)FLR821]; (2002)2UPLBEC1958
Vinod Misra, A.G. and ;A.K. Misra, Adv.
M. Katju, J.1. The petitioner is permitted to delete the name of respondent No. 5 in the array of parties.2. Heard Sri S. M. A. Kazmi learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Advocate General and Sri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jitendra Kumar Gupta Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-10-2003
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2003(3)AWC2399; (2003)2UPLBEC1559
Vinod Misra, Adv. and S.C.
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This is a unique case where the petitioner has considered to have a licence to abuse the process of the Court and approached the Court without complying with the order passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagveer Singh Vs. Chairman, Co-operative Textile Mills Ltd., Bulandsha ...
Allahabad
May-06-1999
ConstitutionTrusts and Societies
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 32, 226, 266(1), 226(1A), 367 and 372; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 2 (2) and (4), 3, 9, 21, 27(2), 29(3), 35, 37, 44, 64, 68, 69, 70, 121, 122, 124 and 128; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Bombay Trust Act, 1950; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(42)
1999(3)AWC2349; (1999)2UPLBEC1251
Vinod Misra, Adv.
N.K. Mitra, C.J. and S.R. Singh, J. 1. Present special appeal has Its genesis in the writ petition which was instituted by the appellant for the relief of quashing the order dated 12.2.1999 whereby the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Through District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar Vs. Ivth Addl. ...
Allahabad
Nov-17-1998
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11, 37, 38 and 47; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 12 and 20; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7 and 18; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7C; Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1972
1998(4)AWC139
Pankaj Bhatia, ;S.P. Gupta and ;Sabhajeet Yadav, Advs.
S.R. Singh, J.1. This petition originates from execution Case No. 179 of 1980. Krishna Gopal Chawla v. U. P. Jal Nigam, and the gravamen of the petitioner is riveted on two orders, firstly the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South East Central Railway V ...
Mumbai
Oct-14-2009
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2(S), 25B(1), 25F, 25G and 25H; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 - Order 11, Rules 14, 15 and 18 - Order 41, Rule 23; Railway Recruitment Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2010(1)BomCR311
Anand Jaiswal, Adv.
A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. The petitioners South East Central Railway, Nagpur, has taken exception to the judgment and award dated 20th March, 2008, passed by Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHazi Raunak Ali Khan Vs. Uco Bank, Bulandshahr and Another
Allahabad
May-27-1999
CompanyLimitation
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 439, 446(1) and (2), 543 and 583(4); Limitation Act 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 117; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 22; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 and 16(3) and (5); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 51
[1999]97CompCas683(All)
Ranjeet Saxena,;Janardan Sahai,;Santosh Kumar,;A.I. Naqvi,;Sharad Verma,;S.N. Verma and;Manoj Mishra, Advs.
Sudhir Narain, J.1. This is an application to recall the order dated 13.1.1997 whereby this Court allowed the application filed by UCO Bank under Section 446(1) of the Companies Act (in short the Act) against M/s...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Kalloomal Tapeshwari Prasad and Co. Vs. M/S. Rastriya Chemicals a ...
Allahabad
Mar-07-1990
CommercialContract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 170
AIR1990All214
A.K. Sharma, Adv.
ORDERN. N. Mithal, J.1. On dismissal of the plaintiffs application for grant of temporary injunction, the present appeal has been filed.2. The respondents have put in appearance and have filed their counter-affidavits to which rejoinder-affidavit by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.P. Singh Baghel Vs. City Magistrate/Election Officer, Allahabad Dist ...
Allahabad
Oct-05-1997
Trusts and SocietiesElection
Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 70 and 70(1); Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, 1968 - Rules 44C and 441
1998(1)AWC503; (1998)1UPLBEC20
S.C., ;Triloki Nath and ;D.P. Singh, Advs.
D.P. Mohapatra, C.J. 1. On consideration of the application filed by Sri S. M. A. Qazmi, learned counsel for the petitioner, with the prayer to take up the case during the vacation since the matter is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »