Advanced Search Results

Siyawati Vs. Phoolwati and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT301

ORDERAbhay M. Naik, J.1. Respondent No. 1 was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Sagouni on 19-1-2005. An election petition was preferred by the present petitioner on the ground that the last child of respondent No....

Smt. Kusum Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 9 and 9(4); Uttar Pradesh Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1938; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1989 - Sections 401, 432, 433 and 433A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Prisoners' Release on Probation Rules, 1964 - Rules 3, 3A, 4 and 6

Reported in : 2006(3)MPLJ187

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Mehta, Govt. Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners in each of the writ petitions have called in question the validity of the circular dated...

Suresh Choudhary Vs. Atarlal Verma and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 8, 36, 36(2), 40, 40(2), 41, 92(5) and 122; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 191, 192, 243O and 226, 329

Reported in : 2006(3)MPLJ506

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh Tiwari, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and; Vinod Mehta, Govt. Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 6

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The centroidal issue that emerges for consideration in this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether the respondent No. 1 is entitled under law to hold the...

Man Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; GFR - Rules 160 and 161; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT489

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dubey and ; Vanshdeep Dalmia, Advs. for Respondent No. 1, ;

Manmohan Singh, J.1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India raises the questions relating to validity of tender process floated by Public Sector undertakings and calls upon this Court to examine the...

Akram vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.11.2025Judgment pronounced on: 05.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 09.01.2026+ CRL.A. 1039/2025 SAZID .....Appellant Through: Ms. Santosh and Mr. Noor-Ul- Islam, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent...

Sazid vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.11.2025Judgment pronounced on: 05.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 09.01.2026+ CRL.A. 1039/2025 SAZID .....Appellant Through: Ms. Santosh and Mr. Noor-Ul- Islam, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent...

Man Industries (India) Limited vs Gail (India) Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 20th February, 2026Judgment pronounced on: 11th March, 2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 191/2019 MAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with...

Om Wati and ors. Vs. Ram Magan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 854-57/2005 Judgment reserved on:1. t April, 2013 Judgment delivered on:29. h April, 2013 % OM WATI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajinder Gulati,...

Ritu Bharga vs.sharad Bhargava

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Pronounced On:31. t August, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C) 221/2018 RITU BHARGA Through: versus ...Appellant Ms. Priyanka Garg, Advocate. SHARAD BHARGAVA Through:... RESPONDENTNone. CORAM: HON'BLE MR....

Tosiba Appliances Co. Pvt. Ltd vs.kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.J. Bhambhani, Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Mr. Nischal Anand, Mr. Aman Taneja

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF DECISION:1. T MAY , 2017 + CS(OS) No.2356/1998 TOSIBA APPLIANCES CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Preet Pal Singh with Ms. Priyam Mehta,...