Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vimal chandra s dave · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 11 2008

Union of India (Uoi) Through General Manager, Western Railway, Mumbai ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-11-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(12)SCALE679:2008AIRSCW7408

Advocate for Respondent : Vimal Chandra S. Dave, Adv.

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. This is an appeal filed at the instance of Union of India against the Judgment and final order dated 29th of December, 2005 passed by the High Court of Gujarat in Civil Application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2009

Haryana Financial Corporation and anr. Vs. Rajesh Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2009

Subject : BankingProperty

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 55 and 55(1); State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2010SC338; 2010(1)AWC821(SC); JT2009(15)SC260; (2010)157PLR390; 2009(14)SCALE569; 2009AIRSCW7677

Advocate for Respondent : Vimal Chandra S. Dave, Adv.

Surinder Singh Nijjar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 26.11.2001 in C.W.P. 5725/2001 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.2. The respondent had approached the High Court with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2011

Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-07-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 304, 306, 309, Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 241(b) ; Universal Determination of Death Act - Section 1, 2, 3(6)

Reported in : AIR2011SC1290

1. Heard Mr. Shekhar Naphade, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned Attorney General for India for the Union of India Mr. Vahanvati, Mr. T. R. Andhyarujina, learned Senior Counsel, whom we had appointed as amicus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 04 2016

Narayanrao Jagobaji Gawande Pub.Trust Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Non-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.870 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.25972 of 2009) NARAYANRAO JAGOBAJI GOWANDE PUBLIC TRUST …APPELLANT Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. …RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2009

Bhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Bd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 1, 2, 2(2), 2(11), 2(12), 4, 6, 14, 15, 15(2), 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13), 3(14), 17G and 44; Security Guards Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147, 145 and 149; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(3); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam - Sections 50(1); Constitution of India - Articles 141, 254 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR656; JT2009(15)SC269; (2010)ILLJ561SC; 2009(14)SCALE623; (2010)2SCC273; 2009(10)LC5041(SC)

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of SLP (Civil) No. 1982 of 2007, SLP (Civil) No. 3624 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4065 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4046 of 2007, SLP (Civil)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2008

Mohmed AmIn @ AmIn Choteli Rahim Miyan Shaikh and anr. Vs. C.B.i. Thro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 15, 15(1), 18, 20(8), 21 and 21(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 34, 114, 120A, 120B, 176 and 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1) and 27; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135 and 135(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 268, 313, 342, 437 and 439; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15, 15(1) and 15(5); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 24 to 30; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17; Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR529; 2008(6)LHSC4434

Advocate for Respondent : A. Sharan, A.S.G., ; Ashok Bhan, ; Amit Anand Tiwari, ;

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. These appeals by Mohmed Faruk @ Frauk Baba Alla Rakha Shaikh, Mohmed Umar Majid Ahmed Pathan @ Mohmed Fighter @ Mohmed Pahelwan @ Mohmedkhan, Sajidali @ Denny Mohmed Ali Saiyed, Mohmed Amin @...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014

Ram Kishan and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-27-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.NOS. 3-4 OF2014IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.3872 OF2010RAM KISHAN & ORS .........APPELLANTS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS .........RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.I.A. No.4 for exemption from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2006

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Yogesh Chandra Dubey and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; Factories Act; Madhya Pradesh Public Health Engineering Department (Non-Gazetted) Service (Conditions of Service and Recruitment) Rules, 1976 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR332]; JT2006(8)SC595; (2006)IIILLJ1060SC; (2006)4MLJ932(SC); 2006(4)MPHT321; 2006(9)SCALE73; (2006)8SCC67; 2006(3)ShimLC284; 2007(2)SLJ186(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vimal Chandra S. Dave, ; Neelam Kalsi and ; Shailendra Naray

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the respondents, who were engaged on daily wages, are entitled to claim minimum of the pay scale attached to the post in which they had been working with applicable allowances,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2003

High Court of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-10-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 9, 10, 10(2), 10(3), 10(4), 31 and 304; Draft Recruitment Rules - Rules 2, 3 and 34; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 217, 234 and 309; Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1959; Bombay Money Lenders Act; Assam Money Lenders Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) Act - Sections 3; Consumer Protection Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC1201; 2003(4)ALLMR(SC)389; [2003(97)FLR422]; (2003)3GLR281; [2003]2SCR799; 2003(2)LC919(SC); (2003) 4 SCC 712

Advocate for Respondent : R. Venkataraman, Sr. Adv., ; Vimal Chandra S. Dave, ; Neelam

Ar. Lakshmanan, J.1. By these four appeals, we are called upon to consider the legality, correctness and validity of the impugned Notification dated 7.12.2000 appointing Shri N.A. Acharya as the President of the Industrial Court at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2003

Haryana State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. Vs. Haryana State ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Haryana Cooperative Society Act, 1984 - Sections 10(2A), 32, 34 and 37(2); Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 10(2A), 10(23A), 31A, 34 and 34A; ;Haryana Cooperative Society Rules - Rule 21; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : JT2003(10)SC383; (2004)ILLJ583SC; 2003(10)SCALE111b; (2004)1SCC574; 2004(2)SLJ218(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vimal Chandra S. Dave, Adv.

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The pivotal issue involved in this appeal relates to the question as to whether the employees working with Primary Agricultural Cooperative Banks (in short 'Primary Bank') are entitled to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial