Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vikram trivedi · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.022 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 2007

Pragnesh Hariprasad Parikh Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-14-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act - Sections 147G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 57, 156, 156(3), 161(1), 167, 190, 197, 209, 309, 377, 397, 397(1), 397(2), 397(3), 398 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395 and 397

Reported in : (2007)3GLR2716

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Shah, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 1,; Amee Yajnik, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6,;

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Pragnesh Hariprasad Parikh, applicant, original accused No. 2, has filed this Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') with a prayer that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2001

Amersy Exports Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-26-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1645

Advocate for Respondent : R.V. Desai, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1 and; A.K. Clerk, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

R.R. Tripathi, J. 1. The present petition is filed by Amersy Exports Private Limited challenging the order dated 20-2-2001, which is produced at Annexure-K to the petition, on various grounds. Before the said challenge can be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2008

Foreshore Co-operative Housing Society Limited, a Co-operative Society ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2008

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 14, 27 and 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 32; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 9A, 115 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 7, Rules 6 and 11 - Order 14, Rule 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Indian Trusts Act, 1882; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 33; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 164

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR600; 2009(1)BomCR757; (2008)110BOMLR3696; 2009(2)MhLj28

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi Kadam, Adv. General, ;V.B. Naik, ;Vikram Trivedi, ;Faisal Sayyed and ;Durgesh Khanapurkar, Advs., i/b., M.K. Ambalal & Co.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 20.1.2006, passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court. The Learned Single Judge has held that the question of limitation could be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 09 1991

Hindustan Lever Limited, Vs. Nirma Private Limited, Ahmedabad

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-1991

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 29; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 15(2), 17, 48 and 51

Reported in : AIR1992Bom195

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Shah,;J.J. Bhatt and;Vikram Trivedi, Advs. i/by;M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal

1. Hindustan Lever Ltd., has filed this suit against Nirma Private Ltd., seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using in relation to soaps or detergent powder the impugned carton, a photograph of which is annexed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1997

Real Value Appliances Ltd. Vs. Vardhaman Spinning and General Mills Li ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-1997

Subject : CompanySICA

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 4, 15, 16, 17, 22 and 25

Reported in : 1998(1)BomCR232; [1998]93CompCas6(Bom); 1997(3)MhLj727

Advocate for Respondent : S. Rahimtoola, ;Vikram Trivedi and ;Mrs. Rita Rahimtoola, Advs., i/b. ;Manilal Kher, ;Ambalal & Co.

ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learnedSingle Judge dated 18th October, 1996 on the company petition filed by the respondents for winding up of the appellant company, by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1992

The Solapur Municipal Corporation Vs. Shivaji Works Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-21-1992

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 127(3) and 406; Taxation Rules - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15 and 16; Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958; Constitution of India - Article 227; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act - Sections 81 and 83

Reported in : AIR1993Bom213; 1993(1)MhLj80

Advocate for Respondent : D.Y. Chandrachud and ;Vikram Trivedi, Advs. i/b. ;M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal

ORDERPendse, J. 1. The respondents arc a company registered under the Companies Act and its office, factory and residential quarters were initially situated if the local limits of a revenue village known as Kumathe in North...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1993

Gear Enterprises Vs. Mafatlal Engineering Industries Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-1993

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 22(1) and (3) and 25; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22(1)

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas756(Bom); 1994(1)MhLj348

Advocate for Respondent : Vikram Trivedi, Adv.

M.S. Rane J.1. The points involved in the petition herein as also in another petition, both field by the creditors for winding up the respondent-company, viz., Mafatlal Engineering Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1997

Real Value Appliances Ltd. Vs. Vardhaman Spinning and General Mills Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-1997

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 4, 15, 15(1), 16, 16(1), (2) and (3), 17, 22, 22(1) and 25

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR306

Advocate for Respondent : S. Rahimtoola, ;Vikram Trivedi and ;Mrs. Rita Rahimtoola, Advs.

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge, dated October 18, 1996, on the company petition filed by the respondents for winding up of the appellant company, by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2007

Exposure Insurance Services Ltd. a Public Limited Company Incorporated ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-19-2007

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 171, 433, 446, 446(1), 446(2), 456 and 457; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; Recovery of Debts Due to the Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR440

Advocate for Respondent : Pankaj Sawant, ;Vikram Trivedi, ;Sachin Chandrana and ;Mayur Bhojwani, Advs., i/b., Manilal Kher Ambalal and Co.

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. This company appeal is directed against the order passed by the Learned Company Judge on 21st March 2007. The appellant company had filed a winding up petition against the respondent company on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1993

Shree Mahesh Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mafatlal Engineering Industries Li ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-1993

Subject : Sica

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1986 - Sections 22(1)

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR281

Advocate for Respondent : Vikram Trivedi, Adv., i/b., Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co.

M.S. Rane, J.1. The points involved in the petition herein as also in another petition, both filed by the Creditors for winding up the respondent-Company viz. M/s Mafatlal Engineering Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial