Advanced Search Results

Kewal Krishan Wadhera Vs. Jai Gopal Kapoor

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1), 14(2) and 26

Reported in : 81(1999)DLT377; 1999(51)DRJ71; 1999RLR482

Advocate for Respondent : Vikram Jaitley, Adv.

Vijender Jain, J. 1. A petitioner under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act was filed by the respondent against the petitioner on account of non-payment of arrears of rent. However, an order was passed...

S and S Construction Co vs Union of India Through E E B F D II

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 13.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 21.01.2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 337/2023 S AND S CONSTRUCTION CO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunwar Chandresh & Ms. Poonam Prasad, Advs.versusUNION OF...

Daewoo Anchor Electronics Ltd. Vs. S.L. Bhalla and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Registration Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11; Specific Relief Act - Sections 2 and 41

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT66; 2001(60)DRJ597

Advocate for Respondent : Vikram Jaitley and ; Vijay Kishan, Advs.

Vijender Jain, J. 1. The present Suit has been filed for recovery, declaration and permanent injunction by the plaintiff, inter-alia, praying for the following relief:-(a) pass an order and decree in favor of the Plaintiff and...

Shri Rajinder Kumar Vs. Shri Iqbal Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Sections 2(15) and 2(24); Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1); Registration Act - Sections 17, 17(1) and 17(2)

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)469; AIR2003Delhi441; 2003(69)DRJ622

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Kishan and ; Vikram Jaitley, Advs. for defendant Nos.1, 2, 4, 6 and 7

B.N. Chaturvedi, J. 1. A Suit for declaration, partition, rendition of accounts and injunction was filed by Sh. Rajinder Kumar, plaintiff against his six brothers, a sister and mother (since deceased) which was disposed of in...

Prabha Patel Vs. Satinder Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Section14(1)

Reported in : 1998(44)DRJ664

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vijay Kishan and ; Mr.Vikram Jaitley, Advs.

N.G. Nandi, J.1. This petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is directed against the decree for possession passed in the proceedings under Section 14(1)(e) of the...

Rita Khurana Kamla Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 49 and 107

Reported in : 1998IIAD(Delhi)745; 1998(44)DRJ654

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vijay Kishan and Mr. Vikram Jaitley, Advs.

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. This is an application moved by the defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint.2. Briefly stated the facts...

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Hindustan Construction Corporation Eng ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 30, 33 and 39; Indian Contract Act - Sections 70

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT502; 2002(61)DRJ299

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vijay Kishen and ; Mr. Vikram Jaitley, Advs.

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The award of the work of construction of LIG Houses at Hastal by the appellant to the respondent vide agreement no. 19/EE/HD-9/86-87 gave rise to disputes resulting in proceedings under section 20...

Tihsaa Industries Ltd. Vs. Avg Computers Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 105; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Order 39, Rule 4

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT854; 2002(61)DRJ317

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Kishan, ; Vikram Jaitley, ; D.R. Mahajan and Vikas Jh

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. The plaintiff/applicant is seeking interim injunction restraining defendants from dispossessing him from the suit premises i.e. portion comprising of reception cell at ground floor, entire first floor, second floor and third floor of...

Everest Electric Works Vs. Himachal Futuristics Communications Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas100(Delhi); 2004(3)ArbLR82

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Kishan, ; Sandeep and ; Vikram Jaitley, Advs.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The question to be answered at this juncture is whether a party is precluded and barred from filing an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to...

Aarohi Builders Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shri Rajeshwar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : 102(2003)DLT686; 2003(67)DRJ169

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Kishan and ; Vikram Jaitley, Advs.

C. K. Mahajan, J.1. These are the applications filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Order 22 Rules 4 and 5 for bringing the legal heirs of defendant No.1 on record and to set aside the...