Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vikash mahajan · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 28 2018

Mr. Mahender Kumar Khandelwal vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-2018

Subject : Education

$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:28. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 844/2018 & CM No.3595/2018 MR. MAHENDER KUMAR KHANDELWAL........ Petitioner Through : Mr. P.K. Mittal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2008

Som Lal Vs. Vijay Laxmi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 208(1); Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961; Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 - Sections 11, 142 and 143; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1960 - Sections 153A, 171E, 171F, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D, 498A and 505; Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 110; Constitution of India - Article 243

Reported in : AIR2008SC2088; JT2008(4)SC403; (2008)151PLR435; 2008(4)SCALE554; (2008)11SCC413; 2008(1)LC527(SC); 2008AIRSCW2750; AIR2008SC2088

Advocate for Respondent : Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr. Adv., ; Vikash Mahajan, ; Aman

A.K. Mathur, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.10.2006 passed by learned Single Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Court whereby the learned Single Judge held that the appellant- Som Lal was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2004

Deepak Arora Vs. Jyoti Arora

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-15-2004

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT98; I(2004)DMC707; 2004(77)DRJ561

Advocate for Respondent : Vikash Mahajan, Adv.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This Revision is directed against the Order dated 3.6.2000 by which the Additional District Judge had decided the application filed by the wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, for interim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial