Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vijay naik · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.042 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2005

Mohammad Sartaj Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-11-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 37, 120B, 147, 148 and 149; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 24(8), 225, 301(2), 319, 321 and 482; Maharashtra Law Officers Appointment (Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 - Rule 22

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2133; 2005(2)MPLJ136

Advocate for Respondent : O.M. Namdeo, Adv. for Nos. 1 to 3 and ;Vijay Naik, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The petitioner along with some others is facing trial for commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 37 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'the IPC') under Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2012

Kalyan Alias Dalya Shiva Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-2012

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: These two appeals by the original accused Nos.1, 2 and 5 in Maharashtra Control of Organised Act, 1999 (Hereinafter referred to as MCOC Act) Special Case Nos.23 of 2007 and 6 of 2008 are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2013

Dinesh Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-2013

Subject : Education

Cr.R.No.392/2008 2.4.2013 Shri Vijay Naik, counsel for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicant has challenged the order dated 4.2.2008 passed by the learned Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 26 2003

Dr. B.M. Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-26-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT373; 2003(4)MPLJ18

Advocate for Respondent : B.M. Mishra, Adv.

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. Heard Shri Vijay Naik, learned Counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has called in question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1996

Rajendra Singh and anr. Vs. Tulsa Bai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-1996

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27

Reported in : I(1996)DMC572

N.P. Singh, J.1. This appeal, as well as First Appeal No. 363 of 1995, arise out of the same judgment and decree dated 25.11.1994 passed by the Additional District judge, Narsinghpur in Civil Suit No. 3-A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2013

Kaliram Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.380/1999 Kali Ram VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Vijay Naik, Advocate with Shri Anand Naik, counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2001

Sanjay Kumar Agrawal Vs. Arjun Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 85, 110-B, 110-CC and 110-D

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT59

Advocate for Respondent : Amrit Ruprah, Adv.

1. This appeal is directed against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narsinghpur, in Claim Case No. 3/89, dated 20-1-1993.2. Accident took place on 29-6-1988 when claimant was going to the scooter of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2012

Ojharam Evane Vs. Jyoti Dhurve

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. A.J.Pawar, Shri. Vijay Naik

E.P.No.46/2009 21.9.2012 Shri Manikant Sharma, Advocate along with petitioner Ojharam Evne present. Shri R.N.Singh, learned Senior Advocate with Shri A.J.Pawar, counsel for respondent no.1. Shri Vijay Naik, counsel for respondent no.4. Petitioner Ojharam Evne is present....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2000

Smt. Sandhya Sharma Vs. Shiv Kumar Sharma

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-08-2000

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13

Reported in : I(2001)DMC58

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Naik, Adv.

ORDERV.K. Agarwal, J. 1. This petition under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code has been filed by the petitioner/ wife for transfer of Civil Suit No. 360-A/98, pending in the Court of III ADJ, Bhopal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2001

Biharilal Jaiswal Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 3, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 52, 52(1), 69, 70 and 70(2); Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Recruitment and General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 27 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1956 - Sections 58 (5) and (6); Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Article 243 to 243-O

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT25

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Vivekanand Awasthy, ;Govt. Adv., Shri K.C. Gildiyal and ;Shri Mukesh Agarwal, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. In all these writ petitions common questions of law and fact arise and, as such, they are being disposed of together.2. Facts lie in a narrow compass. Petitioners are aggrieved by their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial