Advanced Search Results
Mohammad Sartaj Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-11-2005
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 37, 120B, 147, 148 and 149; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 24(8), 225, 301(2), 319, 321 and 482; Maharashtra Law Officers Appointment (Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 - Rule 22
2005CriLJ2133; 2005(2)MPLJ136
O.M. Namdeo, Adv. for Nos. 1 to 3 and ;Vijay Naik, Adv. for Respondent No. 4
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The petitioner along with some others is facing trial for commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 37 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'the IPC') under Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyan Alias Dalya Shiva Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Nov-20-2012
Criminal
Oral Judgment: These two appeals by the original accused Nos.1, 2 and 5 in Maharashtra Control of Organised Act, 1999 (Hereinafter referred to as MCOC Act) Special Case Nos.23 of 2007 and 6 of 2008 are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-02-2013
Education
Cr.R.No.392/2008 2.4.2013 Shri Vijay Naik, counsel for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicant has challenged the order dated 4.2.2008 passed by the learned Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. B.M. Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
May-26-2003
Service
Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2003(3)MPHT373; 2003(4)MPLJ18
B.M. Mishra, Adv.
ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. Heard Shri Vijay Naik, learned Counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has called in question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Singh and anr. Vs. Tulsa Bai
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-17-1996
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27
I(1996)DMC572
N.P. Singh, J.1. This appeal, as well as First Appeal No. 363 of 1995, arise out of the same judgment and decree dated 25.11.1994 passed by the Additional District judge, Narsinghpur in Civil Suit No. 3-A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaliram Vs. the State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-16-2013
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.380/1999 Kali Ram VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Vijay Naik, Advocate with Shri Anand Naik, counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Kumar Agrawal Vs. Arjun Kumar and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-04-2001
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 85, 110-B, 110-CC and 110-D
2002(1)MPHT59
Amrit Ruprah, Adv.
1. This appeal is directed against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narsinghpur, in Claim Case No. 3/89, dated 20-1-1993.2. Accident took place on 29-6-1988 when claimant was going to the scooter of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOjharam Evane Vs. Jyoti Dhurve
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-21-2012
Education
Shri. A.J.Pawar, Shri. Vijay Naik
E.P.No.46/2009 21.9.2012 Shri Manikant Sharma, Advocate along with petitioner Ojharam Evne present. Shri R.N.Singh, learned Senior Advocate with Shri A.J.Pawar, counsel for respondent no.1. Shri Vijay Naik, counsel for respondent no.4. Petitioner Ojharam Evne is present....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Sandhya Sharma Vs. Shiv Kumar Sharma
Madhya Pradesh
May-08-2000
FamilyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13
I(2001)DMC58
Vijay Naik, Adv.
ORDERV.K. Agarwal, J. 1. This petition under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code has been filed by the petitioner/ wife for transfer of Civil Suit No. 360-A/98, pending in the Court of III ADJ, Bhopal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBiharilal Jaiswal Vs. State of M.P. and Others
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-01-2001
Service
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 3, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 52, 52(1), 69, 70 and 70(2); Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Recruitment and General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 27 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1956 - Sections 58 (5) and (6); Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Article 243 to 243-O
2001(4)MPHT25
Shri Vivekanand Awasthy, ;Govt. Adv., Shri K.C. Gildiyal and ;Shri Mukesh Agarwal, Advs.
ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. In all these writ petitions common questions of law and fact arise and, as such, they are being disposed of together.2. Facts lie in a narrow compass. Petitioners are aggrieved by their...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »