Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vijay hansaria · Page 1 of about 136 results (0.088 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 2004

Bharat Hydro Power Corpn. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bharat Hydro Power Corporation Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1996 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7A, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(2), 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24 and 26; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Sections 8 and 11; Bharat Hydro Power Corporation Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Ordinance, 1996; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1), 245, 246, 254 and 254(2); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 19, 26A, 26A(2), 30 and 31 to 34; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4A), 2(6), 26, 26A and 37; ;Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : JT2004(1)SC63; 2004(1)SCALE211; (2004)2SCC553

Ashok Bhan, J.1. These appeals are directed against a common judgment passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gauhati wherein the Division Bench while setting aside the judgment of the learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2005

D. Ganesh Rao Patnaik and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-06-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; ;Bihar Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1946 - Rules 1(2), 2, 3, 5, 6, 15 and 16; ;Constitution of India- Articles 14, 16, 233 and 309; ;Uttar Pradesh Forest Service Rules, 1952; ;Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rules 6, 18, 22(1), 22(3) and 22(4)

Reported in : AIR2005SC4321; 2006(1)BLJR9; [2005(107)FLR868]; [2006(2)JCR91(SC)]; JT2005(10)SC261; 2005(8)SCALE180; (2005)8SCC454; 2006(1)SLJ431(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; Anupam Lal Das and ; Rajan Raj

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 1st April, 2003 of the High Court of Jharkhand by which the writ petition preferred by the appellants was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2005

Narayan Chandra Ghosh and ors. Vs. Kanailal Ghosh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-16-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(2), 2(5), 3, 3(1), 4(1), 5, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10A, 10A(2) and 10A(3); Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 1981 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 19; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 18A, 18A(2), 18A(3) and 18A(4); Calcutta Thika Tenancy Stay of Proceedings (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2006SC562; (SCSuppl)2006(1)CHN105; 2005(9)SCALE350; (2006)1SCC175

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Sanyal, ; Vijay Hansaria, ; Jeevan Dutta Chatterjee,

B.N. Agarwal, J.1. These appeals by the defendants arise out of common judgment rendered by the High Court in second appeals. 2. The short facts are that the plaintiffs filed two suits, viz., Title Suit Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 2006

Bishwanath Prasad Singh Vs. Rajendra Prasad and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-2006

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Bihar Money Lenders Act, 1974 - Sections 12; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58, 58C, 83 and 91; Evidence Act - Sections 91 and 92; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 100

Reported in : AIR2006SC2965; 2006(2)AWC1763(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(3)CHN13; [2006(3)JCR168(SC)]; JT2006(3)SC221; RLW2007(1)SC290; 2006(2)SCALE699; (2006)4SCC432

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. and ; Sheetal Prasad Juneja, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 11th September, 1988 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi in Appeal from Appellate Decree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2004

Samarendra Nath Bhattacharjee Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 405, 419, 420, 467, 469, 471 and 498A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439(2) and 482

Reported in : AIR2004SC4207; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)765; 2004(3)BLJR1768; 2004CriLJ4215; II(2004)DMC400SC; [2004(4)JCR3(SC)]; JT2004(7)SC485; 2004(7)SCALE315; (2004)11SCC165

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; Anand D. Bharat Kumar, ; G. Venk

N. Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. The appellant herein was an accused in a case involving offences punishable under Sections 498A/405/419/420/467/469/471/120B of the IPC before the Court of learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2006

Anil Kumar Tulsiyani Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201 and 302

Reported in : JT2006(5)SC411; 2006(2)KLT806(SC); 2006(II)OLR(SC)59; 2006(5)SCALE233; (2006)9SCC225; 2006(1)LC726(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; C.D. Singh, ; Prashant Chaudhary

H.K. Sema, J.1. Leave granted.2. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 7.9.2005 passed by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11884 of 2005 granting bail...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2006

Board of the Trustees, Port of Kolkata Vs. Efclon Tie-up Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Kolkata Port Trust Act; ;Port Trust Act

Reported in : (2006)3CALLT42(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(4)CHN74; [2006]131CompCas357(SC); (2006)5CompLJ47(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ385(SC); 2006(5)SCALE455; (2006)9SCC763

Advocate for Respondent : U.U. Lalit, ; Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; Jishnov Saha, ;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal was directed against the final judgment and Order dated 01.12.2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in ACO No. 87 of 2003 in APOT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2010

improvement Trust, Ludhiana Vs Ujagar Singh and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-09-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Section 5 of the Limitation Act; Order 21 Rule 66 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC); Order 21 Rule 90 CPC

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Adv.

ORDER1 Heard counsel on either side at length. Records perused. 2 Even though both sides had cited several decisions of this Court on the scope and application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, but it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2004

Jespar I. Slong Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2004

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR2004SC3533; 2004(3)AWC2383(SC); III(2004)BC311; 2004(1)CTLJ527(SC); [2004(4)JCR130(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC104; 2004(5)SCALE724; (2004)11SCC485

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; Pragyan Pradip Sharma, ; Divya J

N. Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. In this appeal the appellant questions the correctness and legality of the judgment of the High Court of Gauhati dated 28.1.2003 made in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2005

Hindustan Copper Ltd. and anr. Vs. Banshi Lal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR2006SC3574; 2006(1)AWC660(SC); [2006(108)FLR339]; JT2005(10)SC474; (2006)ILLJ738SC; (2005)13SCC492; 2006(1)LC138(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv., ; Minakshi Sarma, ; Kanishk Gupta

S.B. Sinha, J.1. The Appellant is a Government of India Undertaking. It had various copper mines and factories situate in different parts of the country. One of its mines was situate in the District of Alwar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial