Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vijai singh · Page 1 of about 120 results (0.078 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 28 1991

Bank of India Vs. M/S Mehta Brothers and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-1991

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2), 11, 20, 96 and 151 - Order 1, Rule 7 - Order 4, Rule 20 - Order 6 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 21, Order 39, Rule 1 and 2; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14 - Schedule - Article 123; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : ILR1991Delhi374

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Khanna, ; S.K. Kaul, Sr. Advs. and ;Ms. Reva Kherapal

1. These are two applications filed by defendant No.6. These were filed on 4-4-1988. First application is under O. 9, R. 13 and S. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the second u/S. 5...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1993

Anil Kumar Misra and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-04-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Cold Storage Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 2(2), 2(6), 5, 12, 17, 19, 27, 28, 37, 37A, 39, 39A, 39(1), 40, 40B and 46; Criminal Procerure Code , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482; Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Cold Storage Rules; Criminal Procerure Code , 1898 - Sections 561A

Reported in : 1994CriLJ2898

ORDERH.N. Tilhari, J.1. By the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have sought for the quashing of the first information report dated 26-10-1990 purporting to have been made under Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2000

Chhotai Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-29-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; U.P. Non-Technical (Class II/Group B) Services (Appointment Demobilised Officers) Rules, 1980 - Rules 3, 4 and 5

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC391; [2001(88)FLR416]; (2001)1UPLBEC492

Advocate for Respondent : Ran Vijai Singh, Adv. and ;S.C.

S.R. Singh, J.1. The question that calls for determination in this writ petition is as to whether the respondents have violated Article 14 of the Constitution in not counting the military service rendered by the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 28 1998

Krishna Kumar Sharma and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-28-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Promotion and Protection of Fruit Trees (Regulation of Harmful Establishments and Housing Schemes) Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 5, 6, 7, 8 and 8(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC54

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;Ran Vijai Singh, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J.1. The order dated 25.5.1998 passed by the District Magistrate and the appellate order dated 28.9.98 passed by the Commissioner. Meerut Division, Meerut, are the subject-matter of impugnment here in the Instant petition under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2003

Babu Nandan (D.) Through L.Rs. Vs. Smt. Esraji

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 331

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2972

Advocate for Respondent : D.S.P. Singh and ;Shamimul Hasnain, Advs.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. The present First Appeal From Order has been filed against the order dated 16.1.1982 by the 1st Addl. District Judge, Jaunpur in Appeal No. 44 of 1979 arising out of Original Suit No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1950

Kanraj Vs. Vijai Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-30-1950

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 130 and 131; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1951Raj74

Advocate for Respondent : Sumer Chand, Adv.

Bapna, J.1 This is an appeal by the pltf in a money suit against one of the defts.2. The applt, Kanraj, filed a suit on 24-7-1948, against the resp, Vijai Singh, Jagirdar of Ramseen, & one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2008

Pawan Kumar Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-08-2008

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC391; [2008(119)FLR1180]

D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri R. N. Singh, Sri Ashok Khare, Sri S.M.A. Kazmi learned senior advocates assisted by their instructing counsels ; Sri P. Section Baghel ; Sri R. B. Singhal and Sri Vijai Gautam,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1992

Sahab Singh and Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-07-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)101

M.B. Sharma, J.1. The learned Special Judge, Dacoity Affected Area, Bharatpur, has convicted each of the accused appellants, namely, Sahab Singh and Jagdish-father and son; respectively, under Section 302/34 IPC and 302 IPC; respectively. Each of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1968

Raj Kumar Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. Raj Kumar Pasupatinath Saran Singh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-1968

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Oudh Estates Act, 1869 - Sections 13 (1), 22 and 22(7); Hindu Law; Tenancy Law

Reported in : AIR1969SC135a; [1969]1SCR1

J.C. Shah, J.1. The following is the genealogical table explaining how the parties are related:RAJA JAGPAL SINGH |Raja Surpal Singh d. 1900(married Rani Jagannath Knar)|Raja Bishwannth Saran Singh d. 1946|__________________________________________________________| | |First wife Second wife Third...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2007

Dubari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-11-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2007(115)FLR653]

Pradeep Kant and Ran Vijai Singh, JJ.1. Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Alok Sinha for the respondents.The petitioners have approached this Court with the grievance that the persons junior to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial