Advanced Search Results
Bank of India Vs. M/S Mehta Brothers and Others
Delhi
Feb-28-1991
Banking
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2), 11, 20, 96 and 151 - Order 1, Rule 7 - Order 4, Rule 20 - Order 6 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 21, Order 39, Rule 1 and 2; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14 - Schedule - Article 123; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; Companies Act, 1956
ILR1991Delhi374
P.C. Khanna, ; S.K. Kaul, Sr. Advs. and ;Ms. Reva Kherapal
1. These are two applications filed by defendant No.6. These were filed on 4-4-1988. First application is under O. 9, R. 13 and S. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the second u/S. 5...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar Misra and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-04-1993
Criminal
Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Cold Storage Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 2(2), 2(6), 5, 12, 17, 19, 27, 28, 37, 37A, 39, 39A, 39(1), 40, 40B and 46; Criminal Procerure Code , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482; Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Cold Storage Rules; Criminal Procerure Code , 1898 - Sections 561A
1994CriLJ2898
ORDERH.N. Tilhari, J.1. By the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have sought for the quashing of the first information report dated 26-10-1990 purporting to have been made under Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhotai Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad
Nov-29-2000
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; U.P. Non-Technical (Class II/Group B) Services (Appointment Demobilised Officers) Rules, 1980 - Rules 3, 4 and 5
2001(1)AWC391; [2001(88)FLR416]; (2001)1UPLBEC492
Ran Vijai Singh, Adv. and ;S.C.
S.R. Singh, J.1. The question that calls for determination in this writ petition is as to whether the respondents have violated Article 14 of the Constitution in not counting the military service rendered by the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Krishna Kumar Sharma and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Oct-28-1998
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Promotion and Protection of Fruit Trees (Regulation of Harmful Establishments and Housing Schemes) Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 5, 6, 7, 8 and 8(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
1998(4)AWC54
S.C. and ;Ran Vijai Singh, Adv.
S.R. Singh, J.1. The order dated 25.5.1998 passed by the District Magistrate and the appellate order dated 28.9.98 passed by the Commissioner. Meerut Division, Meerut, are the subject-matter of impugnment here in the Instant petition under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Nandan (D.) Through L.Rs. Vs. Smt. Esraji
Allahabad
May-22-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 331
2003(4)AWC2972
D.S.P. Singh and ;Shamimul Hasnain, Advs.
Rajes Kumar, J.1. The present First Appeal From Order has been filed against the order dated 16.1.1982 by the 1st Addl. District Judge, Jaunpur in Appeal No. 44 of 1979 arising out of Original Suit No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanraj Vs. Vijai Singh
Rajasthan
Aug-30-1950
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 130 and 131; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 1
AIR1951Raj74
Sumer Chand, Adv.
Bapna, J.1 This is an appeal by the pltf in a money suit against one of the defts.2. The applt, Kanraj, filed a suit on 24-7-1948, against the resp, Vijai Singh, Jagirdar of Ramseen, & one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan Kumar Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-08-2008
ServiceConstitution
2009(1)AWC391; [2008(119)FLR1180]
D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri R. N. Singh, Sri Ashok Khare, Sri S.M.A. Kazmi learned senior advocates assisted by their instructing counsels ; Sri P. Section Baghel ; Sri R. B. Singhal and Sri Vijai Gautam,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahab Singh and Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
May-07-1992
Criminal
1992WLN(UC)101
M.B. Sharma, J.1. The learned Special Judge, Dacoity Affected Area, Bharatpur, has convicted each of the accused appellants, namely, Sahab Singh and Jagdish-father and son; respectively, under Section 302/34 IPC and 302 IPC; respectively. Each of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Kumar Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. Raj Kumar Pasupatinath Saran Singh ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-19-1968
Tenancy
Oudh Estates Act, 1869 - Sections 13 (1), 22 and 22(7); Hindu Law; Tenancy Law
AIR1969SC135a; [1969]1SCR1
J.C. Shah, J.1. The following is the genealogical table explaining how the parties are related:RAJA JAGPAL SINGH |Raja Surpal Singh d. 1900(married Rani Jagannath Knar)|Raja Bishwannth Saran Singh d. 1946|__________________________________________________________| | |First wife Second wife Third...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDubari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-11-2007
Service
[2007(115)FLR653]
Pradeep Kant and Ran Vijai Singh, JJ.1. Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Alok Sinha for the respondents.The petitioners have approached this Court with the grievance that the persons junior to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »