Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vigneshwar s shastry · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 16 2009

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. by Regional Manager Vs. Smt. Parvathi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-16-2009

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166

Advocate for Respondent : Vigneshwar S. Shastry, Adv. for R1 to R5 and; Basavaraj Kareddy, Adv. for R6

A.N. Venugopala Gowda, J.1. Respondents 1 to 5 had filed MVC 460/2005 against the appellant/6th respondent and one J.K. Ramegowda under Section 166 of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, he said petition was allowed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2007

Shree Shree Vishwothama theertha Swamigal, Mathadhipathi of Sri Sonda ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-10-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rule 18 - Order 26, Rule 9

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3856; 2007(6)AIRKarR252

Advocate for Respondent : Narayan V. Yaji, Adv.

ORDERS. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. Petitioner has called in question the order passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Karwar, on I.A. No. 5 dated 14.9.2006 in R.A. No. 40/1999 whereby the lower appellate Court has allowed the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2017

Abdulsab Nannesab Totad @ Jekinkatti Vs. Sahadevappa Mallappa Suragond

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-19-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF APRIL2017BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR R.S.A. No.86/2005 (DEC) BETWEEN:1. ABDULSAB NANNESAB TOTAD @ JEKINKATTI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 03 2010

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Now Represented by Divisional Offi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-03-2010

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 145, 146, 147, 164 and 173(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 151 - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 41, Rules 21, 22 and 27

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Sawkar, Adv. for R-4,; A.V.G. Associates for R5 and;

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Two applications, Misc. Cvl. 11793/09 filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) r/w Section 151 CPC seeking for impleading one D.D. Paramesh S/o Devegowda, Coffee Planter, Kanchinakaldurga, Doddamagaravalli, Aldur Post, Chikkamagalur Taluk, as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2004

Devi and ors. Vs. Prabhakar and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-22-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 3 and 10

Reported in : II(2004)ACC870; [2004(102)FLR911]; 2004(3)KarLJ397

Advocate for Respondent : Vigneshwar S. Shastry, Adv. for Respondent-1 and ;Nithin Agarwal, Adv. for Respondent-2

Ram Mohan Reddy, J.1. The legal representatives of the deceased Sukumar Lengade have preferred this appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short, the 'Act'), calling in question the legality and validity...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2008

Neela D/O Bhanu Naik Vs. Saroja D/O Keera Naik and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-14-2008

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6 and 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2008Kant132; ILR2008KAR2545; 2009(2)KarLJ147

Advocate for Respondent : G.V. Kodanda Ram, Adv. for; Vigneshwar S. Shastry, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3,; Prashanth T. Pandit, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 5 to 8

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This second appeal udder Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure involves two short but interesting questions of law. The first is as to whether the customary practice prevalent in a community...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1997

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kalinadi Project, Dandeli Vs. So ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12 and 18(3); Karnataka Act, 1961

Reported in : ILR1998KAR433; 2000(3)KarLJ62

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Vigneshwar S. Shastry, Adv.

ORDER1. Though the matter is listed for admission, with the consent of both sides, this C.R.P. has been taken up for final disposal and the same is accordingly disposed of by this order.2. It appears that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2005

Gangothri Yuvaka Sangha Vs. Yarab Youth Association and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-10-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960; Karnataka Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Control Order, 1992

Reported in : 2005(4)KarLJ590

Advocate for Respondent : Vigneshwar S. Shastri, Adv. for Respondent-1 and ;B.N. Prasad, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent-2

ORDERK.L. Manjunath, J. 1. Petitioner and respondent 1 are associations registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. Pursuant to a notification issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Tumkur, petitioner, 1st respondent along with others filed applications...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 2008

Bheemappa and ors. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-18-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 77A; Hyderabad Abolition of Inams Act, 1954

Reported in : 2008(5)KarLJ517

Advocate for Respondent : Nadiga Shivanandappa, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent 1 and ;Vigneshwar S. Shastri, Adv. for Respondent 2

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. These three petitioners, assailing the correctness of the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore dated 4th July, 2006 passed in Appeal No. 1227 of 2004 in respect of land bearing Sy....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2004

Suresh Bacha Pujari Vs. Bandu S. Chougala and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-09-2004

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 - Sections 173(1)

Reported in : III(2005)ACC649; 2005ACJ1056; ILR2005KAR697; 2005(4)KarLJ45

Advocate for Respondent : Vigneshwar S. Shastry, Adv. for R1 and ;K.N. Srinivasa, Adv. for R2

Ajit J. Gunjal, J.1. Personal injuries maybe inflicted by means of a large number of very different torts. The tort of negligence qualifies to take easily the larger share. An unfortunate victim of an accident is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial