Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: verma and · Page 1 of about 24,920 results (0.309 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 2002

Manpyare and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 375 and 376

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3046; 2002(1)MPHT253; 2002(2)MPLJ11

Advocate for Respondent : Raj Kumar Verma, Panel Lawyer

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment and findings dated 21-11-89 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in the Sessions Trial No. 48/87 whereby the appellants were convicted for offences...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2002

Committee of Management, Prem Lal Singhania Kanya Inter College and an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1554; (2002)3UPLBEC2450

Advocate for Respondent : Shailesh Verma, Adv. and ;Ashok Khare, S.C.

R.R. Yadav, J. 1. Heard Sri Raj Kumar Jain, learned counsel for petitioners, learned standing counsel as well as Sri Ashok Khare, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Shailesh Verma representing respondent No. 4. 2. It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2006

Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. District Judge (incharge) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92, 115, 115(1), 115(2), 115(3) and 115(4) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A, 3A, 4 and 10 - Order 43, Rule 1; General Clauses Act;

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3281

Advocate for Respondent : Shesh Verma, Adv. and ;C.S.C.

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Controversy relates to interpretation of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Whether against an order issuing notice to defendants on an application for temporary injunction filed under Order XXXIX, Rules...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 16 1995

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kanpur Vs. Kamla Town Trust

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-16-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 26 and 31; Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3) and 34; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 11, 148 and 256(1); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 34; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 11, 40, 41, 42 and 43; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 92 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 2, Rule 2; Indian Companies Act, 1913 ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 11, 40, 41, 42 and 43; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 92 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 2, Rule 2; Indian Companies Act, 1913

Reported in : AIR1996SC620; (1996)130CTR(SC)112; [1996]217ITR699(SC); JT1995(8)SC364; 1995(6)SCALE517; (1996)7SCC349; [1995]Supp5SCR300

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Verma, ; M.M. Kshatriya, ; Arun Banerjee and ;

ORDERS.B. Majmudar, J.1. In this group of 17 appeals by special leave, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur has brought in challenge the judgment and order dated 20th February 1975 of the Allahabad High Court in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2002

Forbes Gokak Ltd. Vs. Central Warehousing Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-08-2002

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 7, 55, 56, 73 and 74; Constitution of India - Article 141; Motor Vehicles Act; Motor Vehicles Rules

Reported in : 2003(1)ARBLR279(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Manvender Verma, Adv.

S. Mukherjee, J.1. These are objections to part of an award dated 9th August, 2000 passed by Shri B.K. Sharma, IAS (Retd) inter-alia on the ground that the findings are perverse, and also on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 2005

ShahabuddIn and Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-27-2005

Subject : Election

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 140; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 62(4) and 94; Evidence Act - Sections 73 and 78; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 93

Advocate for Respondent : Dronacharya and P.K. Verma, Advs. for Responent No. 5 and Mahesh Prasad, Govt. Pleader No. 3

Aftab Alam, J.1. These two writ petitions arise from two suits (filed under Section 140 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993) in which the elections of Mukhiyas of two Gram Panchayats, namely, Rampur Parihas and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1993

Cit, Gujarat-i, Ahmedabad Vs. Ahmedabad Cotton Mfg. Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-15-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 28, 37 and 37(1); Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948

Reported in : I(1994)BC95(SC); [1994]205ITR163(SC); JT1993(6)SC155; 1993(4)SCALE250; (1994)1SCC632; [1993]Supp3SCR392

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Verma, Adv. for ; JBD and Co. and ; M.K. Puri, Adv. in

N. Venkatachala, J.1. These are the appeals of the Revenue arising from different judgments of the Gujarat High Court delivered on References, made at its instance under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

indu Shekhar Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5A, 5A(1), 5A(2), 7(1) and 59(4); Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development (Amendment) Act, 1985; Uttar Pradesh Palika (Centralised) Services Rules, 1966; Uttar Pradesh Development Authority Centralised Services Rules, 1985 - Rules 4, 7, 7(1), 9(2), 16, 17, 25, 25(3), 28, 28(1), 37, 37(1), 37(2) and 37(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 309 and 311; Uttar Pradesh Water Sewarage Act; Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services Act; Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1986 - Rule 7(1); Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services (Amendment) Rules, 2002; Delhi Police (Appointment and Recruitment) Rules, 1980 - Rule 5

Reported in : AIR2006SC2432; 2006(4)ALD66(SC); 2006(3)AWC2187(SC); JT2006(5)SC260; (2006)4MLJ135(SC); 2006(5)SCALE107; (2006)8SCC129

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Verma, ; A.K. Srivastava and ; Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv

ORDER For fixation of seniority of Shri Sushil Chandra Dwivedi, Assistant Engineer in Authority Centralised Services, the Government Order No. 416912/9Aa-5-91/94 dated 6.11.95 with respect to inclusion of service rendered by him in State Planning Institute...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2002

Nandlal Yadav Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 376

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2184; 2002(2)MPHT144

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Verma, Adv.

U.N. Singh, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment and findings recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh, in the Sessions Trial No. 112/87, whereby the accused/appellant was convicted of offences under Sections 376...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2003

Abhinav Silicate Industry Vs. Chairman, Central Coalfields Ltd. and an ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-30-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR588(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Banani Verma, Adv.

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. In this writ application, the petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing the order/letter dated 4.8.1999 (Annexure 3) insofar as it relates to the petitioner whereby and whereunder the authorities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial