Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: vepa p sarathi · Page 1 of about 59 results (0.069 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 25 1949

Sri Raja Velugoti Sarbagna Kumara Krishna Yachendra Bahadur Varu, Raja ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-25-1949

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 - Sections 77, 112, 145, 145(5) and 147; Madras Estates Land (Amendment) Act, 1934

Reported in : AIR1950Mad347

Advocate for Respondent : Vepa P. Sarathy, Adv.

Viswanatha Sastri, J.1. Defendant 1 is the appellant in this second appeal which has been filed against a decree awarding possession and mesne profits to the plaintiffs. The property described in the suit consists of two...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1990

Kanchenjunga Properties Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Sikkim and ors ...

Court : Sikkim

Decided on : Dec-05-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 166 and 371F; Sikkim (Collection of Taxes and Prevention of Evasion of Payment of Taxes) Act, 1987; Indian Income Tax Act; Sikkim (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1975; Constitution of India (36th Amendement) Act, 1975; Registration of Companies Act, Sikkim, 1961

Reported in : [1991]191ITR575(Sikkim)

Advocate for Respondent : Vepa P. Sarathi, Adv. General and; N.P. Sharma, Advs.

R. Dayal, J.1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution filed by petitioner No. 1, which is a private limited company (hereinafter referred as 'the company') and petitioners Nos. 2 to 5 who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1996

Sukra Diamond Tools Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-12-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(6A), 2(15), 3, 4(1), 6, 14, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43B, 43D, 70, 71, 72, 80, 86, 139(1), 139(3), 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 154, 157, 246 and 264

Reported in : (1997)137CTR(Mad)629; [1998]229ITR682(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Subramanian for ;C.V. Rajan, Adv.

Kanakaraj, J.1. These two writ petitions filed by the same petitioner raise an interesting question of law relating to the interpretation of s. 143(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), r/w s. 143(1A)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 2004

Dr. Pran Nath Kapoor Vs. the Chairman-cum-managing Director Sbi and or ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-16-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Respondent : Nilu Agrawal, Adv.

P.M. Prasad, J.1. The petitioner, who retired from the service of the respondent State Bank of India on 30th September, 1992, is aggrieved by denial of his pensionary benefits on the ground that his retirement is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1979

C.M. Vareekutty Vs. C.M. Mathukutty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-10-1979

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1980)1SCC537; 1980(12)LC188(SC)

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. Two brothers, untouched by any trace of fraternal affection have been waging war in the Courts without grace and with shear cantankerousness for over thirty years. Mathu, their father died in February,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1979

Erinti Seethayya and ors. Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-05-1979

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1979SC1411; (1979)4SCC534; 1979(11)LC313(SC)

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.The question in this appeal is about the compensation, to be awarded for the land belonging to the appellant which was acquired by the Government pursuant to a notification dated 17th March, 1960...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1979

Maddada Chayanna Vs. Karnam Narayana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-14-1979

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 55, 56(1) and 56(2)

Reported in : AIR1979SC1320; (1979)3SCC42; [1979]3SCR201; 1979(11)LC459(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Ex parte

Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. The petitioner who lost before the Subordinate Tribunals and the High Court is the appellant in this appeal by special leave. Alleging that he was the landlord and that the respondents were his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1979

Dr. Miss Annie M. Pichamuthu and anr. Vs. Dr. Mrs. Bessie Thangam Selv ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-09-1979

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1979SC1431; (1979)4SCC197; 1979(11)LC319(SC)

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. Late Dr. Arulmani purchased a house in Madurai on 24th January 1908. One of her sisters, Kamalam James, lived with her in that house from 1928 to 1948. The relations between Dr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2005

Associated Cement Companies Limited Vs. the State of Karnataka Represe ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-29-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(9), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(8), 3(9), 4, 5, 5(2), 5(4), 5(5), 5(6), 7, 9 and 12; Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 - Sections 15(A); Sales Tax Act; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Entry Tax Act; Punjab General Sales Tax Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Rules, 1979 - Rule 7

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1446; (2008)11VST811(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : Sujatha, Additional Government Adv.

ORDERH.L. Dattu, J.1. The assessee is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and also a dealer registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 (KTEG...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1954

Southern Railways and anr. Vs. the Railway Rates Tribunal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1954

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 28, 39, 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : AIR1955Mad476; (1956)IMLJ395

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General and ;Vepa P. Sarathi, Adv. in W.P. 1007 of 53 and ;V. Thyagarajan and ;M.A. Rajagopalan, Advs. in W.P. No. 961 of 53

Rajamannar, C.J.1. Both these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution are directed against the Railway Rates Tribunal in respect of their proceedings on a complaint filed by a firm called the Engineering Supplies Co.,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial