Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: venkatesan · Page 1 of about 1,185 results (0.182 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 18 2004

i. Jairaj Vs. B. Champalal JaIn and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2004

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 17, 22 and 22(1)

Reported in : II(2004)BC373; [2004]122CompCas79(Mad); (2004)2MLJ235; [2004]54SCL432(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : A. Venkatesan, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Since the petitioner is one and the same and issue raised is also similar, they are being disposed of by the following common Order. C.R.P.No. 3388 of 2001 is directed against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2008

Bheru Lal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-18-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj565

A.M. Kapadia, J.1. Sole appellant ('the accused', for short) was charged and tried by learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No. 208/01 for offence under Section 302 and 201 of the Indian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1981

C. Manuel Vs. Management of Needle Industries (India) Ltd. Keeti, Nilg ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-1981

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(5), 20 and 22; Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 24

Reported in : (1981)IILLJ102Mad

1. In the present Writ Petition, the petitioner challenges the award dated 2-7-1977 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore, the 2nd respondent herein, in I.D. No. 44 of 1977, Certain admitted facts have got...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2010

Dr.S.Peer Mohamed .Vs. the Registrar, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.V.Venkatesan; Mr.S.Gopalaratnam, Advs.

1. The petitioner obtained degree in Master of Veterinary Science in Surgery from the first respondent - University in the year 1987. He joined as Assistant Professor in the Department of Veterinary Surgery on 01.05.1990 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2007

Arivukanni Vs. Saravanan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-25-2007

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 207 and 248(1)

Reported in : II(2007)DMC457

Advocate for Respondent : V.R. Balasubramanian, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 3 and ;D.J. Venkatesan, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

ORDERA.C. Arumugaperumal Adityan, J.1. This Revision has been preferred against the judgment in C.A. No. 74 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC. No. I,) Chengalput. The complaint preferred by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2001

K. Sadasivam and Another Vs. B. Harikrishnan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-02-2001

Subject : PropertyTenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Tami Nadu City Tenants Protection Act - Sections 9

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ300

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A. Venkatesan, Adv.

ORDER1. The defendant are the appellants. The case of the respondents is as follows:He is a tenant of the land in old No. 77, New No. 128, Gangadeshwar Koil Street, Chennai - 4, which belongs to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2010

The Branch Manager, the New India Assurance Company Ltd., Vs. Balaguru ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-10-2010

Subject : Motor Vehicles.

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.A.Venkatesan, Adv.

1. The New India Assurance Company Limited represented by its Branch Manager, Perambalur Branch, which figured as respondent No.2 before the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.71 of 2004, is the appellant herein. The first respondent herein preferred a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2000

Abdul Karim Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 321; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 326, 341, 342 and 396; Indian Explosives Act - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25; Tamil Nadu Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Preventive Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 4, 4(1) and 5

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)12; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)14; 2001CriLJ148; 2000(7)SCALE313; [2000]Supp4SCR382; AIR 2001 SC 116

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. The border between the States of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu runs through mountainous forest. On about 16,000 acres of this forest land, half in Karnataka and half in Tamil Nadu, a man named...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1984

Shelat Brothers and Etc. Vs. Lodd Narendradas and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-11-1984

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10, 10(3) and 23; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) (Amendment) Act, 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - 0rder 41, Rule 22

Reported in : AIR1985Mad95

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General for ;A. Venkatesan, Adv. and ;S.S. Trivedi, Adv.

ORDER1. These civil revision petitions arise out of proceedings in eviction instituted by the respondents in C.R.P. Nos. 313 of 1984 and 314 of 1984 and the petitioner in Civil Revision Petition No. 1285 of 1984...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2001

Rajearajeswari Packaging Products Vs. Dev Fasteners Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-29-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 434(1); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 95

Reported in : [2002]108CompCas715(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Narendran and ;S. Venkatesan, Advs.

Padmanabhan, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') praying this court to wind up the respondent-company as it is unable to pay its debts.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial