Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: venkataramanayya · Page 1 of about 111 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 01 1985

Smt. Maina Devi Vs. Thakur Mansingh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-01-1985

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 41, Rule 27; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 60

Reported in : AIR1986Raj44; 1985(2)WLN329

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Tiwari, Adv.

Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. This is a Civil first appeal against the judgment & decree dated the 26th Jan. 1980 passed by the District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur by the defendant appellant-Smt. Maina Devi against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1960

Makkapati Purnananda Sastri Vs. Chintalapati Purnanandam and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-17-1960

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 32(3) and 32(7)

Reported in : AIR1961AP435

Advocate for Respondent : D. Radhakrishna Murthy, ;M.S. Ramachandra Rao, ;D. Radhakrishna, ;G. Chandrasekhara Sastry, ;A.S. Prakasam, ;K.B. Krishna Murthy and ;M.S.R. Subrahmanyam, Advs.

Umamaheswaram, J. 1. This is an appeal directed by the plaintiffagainst the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge of Vijayavada dismissing his suitfor recovery of possession of the properties mentioned in A to D schedules...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1894

Santappayya Vs. Rangappayya

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-1894

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1895)ILR18Mad397

1. The question which arises for determination in this appeal is whether respondent's adoption can be upheld. Both the Courts below have found that the adoption is proved, and that Manjamma had her husband's permission to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 26 1967

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Papanna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-26-1967

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342

Reported in : AIR1969AP291; 1969CriLJ1035

Advocate for Respondent : V. Venkataramanaiah, Adv.

Obul Reddi, J.1. The State has preferred this appeal against the acquittal of the accused-respondent of the charges framed against him under Section 302, I. P. C. for causing the murder of his wife, and under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1935

Maddipatla Agnihotra Deekshitalu and ors. Vs. Ramavarapu Venkataramayy ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-03-1935

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1936Mad293

Venkataramana Rao, J.1. The main question in this second appeal relates to a right of contribution. The facts necessary for its disposal may be briefly stated. One Dikshitalu senior had a son Dikshitalu junior who predeceased...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1962

Bajirao Bhawanrao Vs. Bansilal Ganeshlal and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-10-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 9(1) 24, 28, 33, 50, 53, 75 and 75(1); Evidence Act - Sections 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22

Reported in : AIR1963Bom212; (1963)65BOMLR39; ILR1963Bom173

Advocate for Respondent : V.R. Manohar, Adv.

ORDER1. The order in Civil Revision Application No. 288 of 1961 will also dispose of Civil Revision Application No. 241 of 1961. In both these cases the applicant is the same person, namely, one Bajirao son...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 1950

Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Ambalal Trikamlal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-21-1950

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35 and 96 - Order 21, Rule 1, 1(1) and 1(2) - Order 41, Rule 22

Reported in : AIR1951Bom394; (1951)53BOMLR582; ILR1951Bom768

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Shah, Adv. in Nos. 517, 518, 520 and 521

Dixit J.1. These five appeals which arise in execution proceedings raise a common question of law & they may conveniently be disposed of by a common judgment. The question is whether in the case of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1952

Revanna Devaru Vs. A.V. Ranga Rao and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-26-1952

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 60; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144

Reported in : AIR1952Kant119; AIR1952Mys119

Advocate for Respondent : N. Keshava Iyengar and ;M.L. Venkatanarasimhaiya, Advs.

1. The suit out of which this appeal arises was filed by the first respondent for redemption of the properties now in dispute. According to his case the property belonged to his father Venkataramanayya and his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1938

Abdul Waheed Khan and anr. Vs. Ram Bux and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-02-1938

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1939All49

ORDERMulla, J.1. This is an application in revision under Section 115, Civil P.C., against a decree paused by the learned Civil Judge of Jaunpur on the basis of an award in the following circumstances : It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1948

Dunna Venkata Rao Vs. Sree Rajah Saheb Meharban I Dostan Sree Rajah Ra ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-03-1948

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 21, Rules 11 to 14, 17 and 57; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 182(5)

Reported in : AIR1950Mad2

Advocate for Respondent : Raghava Rao, Adv.

Satyanarayana Rao, J.1. This second appeal was referred by me to be heard by a Bench as it raised two important questions, one relating to the interpretation of Order 21, Rule 57, Civil P. C., as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial