Advanced Search Results

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Vinod Prakash Tayal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC412

M.N. Venkatachaliah and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the caveator. The points urged by the learned counsel on the merits of the view taken by the...

In Re: Ram Janma Bhumi-babri Masjid

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 143(1); Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Rules 1, 2 Order 32

Reported in : (1993)1SCC642

M.N. Venkatachaliah,; A.M. Ahmadi,; J.S. Verma,; G.N. Ray; S.P. Bharucha1. On January 7, 1993, the President of India, in exercise of powers conferred on him under Article 143(1) of the Constitution of India, referred the following...

Tarsem Lal Gautam and anr. Vs. State Bank of Patiala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 32; State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 - Section 63

Reported in : AIR1989SC31; JT1988(4)SC184; (1989)ILLJ39SC; 1988(2)SCALE924; (1989)1SCC182; [1988]Supp3SCR479

M.N. VENKATACHALIAH, J.1. This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises the question of the validity of Regulation 7 read with Schedule I of State Bank of Patiala (Officers') Service Regulations, 1979...

Vishnu Traders Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1995Supp(1)SCC461

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Indu Malhotra

M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J. and; S. Mohan, J.1. We have heard Shri Harish Salve, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Ms Indu Malhotra, learned counsel for the respondent who was asked to take notice.2. The grievance...

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Vishwanath Prasad (Dr)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 136

Reported in : 1995Supp(2)SCC145

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Dhingra

M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J. and; S. Mohan, J.1. We have heard learned counsel on both sides. Delay condoned. Special leave granted.2. The respondent was at the relevant point of time and continues to be the Principal of...

Pepsu Road Transport Corporation Vs. Satinder Kumar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC597

M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J. and; S. Mohan, J.1. Heard learned counsel on both sides.2. The High Court has directed the appointment of the respondent to the post of a Clerk on “compassionate grounds” in view of the...

Deputy Commissioner of Police and ors. Vs. Akhlaq Ahmad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ669SC

ORDERM.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J. 1. Heard learned Counsel on both sides.2. We do consider the contentions of Shri K. Lahiri, learned Senior Counsel, against the correctness of the order of the Tribunal eminently arguable. It is true...

Baroda Municipal Corporation, Khanderrao Market, Baroda Vs. Sharmjivi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1992Supp(2)SCC629

M.N. Venkatachaliah and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The respondents before us were parties to an earlier proceeding in this Court being Writ Petition No. 657 of 1986 and had in terms...

Cit, Bhopal Vs. Tawarfe Motilal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68, 297(2)(d)(ii)

Reported in : 1989Supp(2)SCC449

R.S. Pathak, C.J. and; M.N. Venkatachaliah, J.1. The only point raised before the High Court by learned counsel for the assessee (the respondent before us) was that Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was...

Mr. Raj Duggal Vs. Ramesh Kumar Bansal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 37, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1990SC2218; 1991Supp(1)SCC191

M.N. Venkatachaliah and; N.M. Kasliwal, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel for both the parties. Special leave granted.2. The appeal is against the order made by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing Civil Review...