Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: venkatachalam · Page 1 of about 1,416 results (0.174 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 05 1991

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. T.N. Viswanatha Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-05-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 143, 154, 207, 208, 209, 214 and 271(1)

Reported in : (1991)98CTR(AP)49; [1991]190ITR266(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : Y. Ratnakar, Adv.

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This is a reference at the instance of the Revenue. The following question of law has been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for the decision of this court : 'Whether, on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2002

Rajendran, Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 114A; Evidence Act - Sections 323, 324, 366, 376, 376(2), 401 and 506

Reported in : 2003(1)ALT(Cri)27; 2002CriLJ2202

Advocate for Respondent : E. Raja, Addl. P. P.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. On 13.4.1990 mid night at 2.00 A.M., the victim girl Kalaiselvi P.W.1 aged about 19 years along with her sister P.W.2 aged about 12 years was proceeding towards home after attending the Thiruvizha...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1973

Sappani Mohamed Mohideen and anr. Vs. R.V. Sethusubramania Pillai and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-07-1973

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1974SC740; (1974)1SCC615; [1974]2SCR594

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Ramamurthi and ; J. Ramamurti, ; Advs.

Goswami, J.1. In this appeal we have to go back to a period close upon a passing century to divine what a Hindu Joint Family that had separated at that distant date, thought, contemplated, did and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 20 2001

Smt. Dr. Nagarathinam Vs. M. Kalirajan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-20-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 12

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3007

Advocate for Respondent : O. Venkatachalam, Adv.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Before pronouncing the order in this application for quashing on merits, this Court cannot but record a note of anguish over the conduct of Mr. O. Venkatachalam, the learned counsel appearing for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2003

Shankaran Narayan Vs. State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 432 and 433; Prisoners Act

Reported in : 2003(2)CTC482

Advocate for Respondent : O. Venkatachalam and ;N. Doraiswamy, Advs. in R.T. No. 2/2003 and I. Subramanian, Public Prosecutor in C.A. No. 204/2003

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The appellants in the appeal stand convicted in S.C. No. 514/2001 on the file of the Additional Court of Sessions, Tuticorin, for offences under Section 302 r/w Section 34 I.P.C. (5 counts) and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1999

Simon and Another Vs. Thankammal and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-12-1999

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 11, 100, 105 and 115 -- Order 8, Rule 9 -- Order 6, Rule 17 -- Order 41, Rule 23; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 52

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC705

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. O. Venkatachalam, Adv.

ORDER1. The civil revision petition has been filed against the order allowing the application for amendment of the written statement by the learned District Munsif, Eraniel in I.A.No. 133 of 1997 in O.S.No. 2 of 1997...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2000

The Management Coimbatore District Co-operative Milk Producers Union, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-04-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Payments of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981 -- Sections 3 and 5; Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Rules, Rules 5; Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, Sections 33(C)(2)

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC397

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. O. Venkatachalam, Adv.

ORDER1. Aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court, Coimbatore in C.P.Nos.628 and 868 of 1996 dated 23.12.96 directing the petitioner to pay subsistence allowance of Rs.10,050 and 5,520 respectively, the Management, District Co-operative Milk Producer's...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2001

Dgp Windsor (India) Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-17-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)74TTJ(Mumbai)291

ORDERJ.P. Bengra, V.P.This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), Central-VI, Mumbai, pertaining to block assessment for the period from 1-4-1987, to 26-9-1997. The assessee has raised the following grounds in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1997

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kotagiri Industrial Co-operative Tea Fa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)139CTR(SC)359

BY THE COURT :This appeal, by certificate, is directed against the judgment of the Madras High Court dt. 22nd Jan., 1982 in Tax Case No. 407 of 1977. The Kotagiri Industrial Co-operative Tea Factory Ltd., respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2004

Magna Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-05-2004

Subject : Election

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 19, 38, 38(5), 97 and 97(3)

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2097; 2004(4)WLC347

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, Dy. G.A. and; M.S. Singhvi, Adv.

N.P. Gupta, J.1. Vide order dt. 2.3.2000, notice for final hearing was issued. Notice of the stay application was also issued. Thereafter vide order dt. 29.3.2000, after service of the respondent, the matter was ordered to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial