Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. T.N. Viswanatha Reddy
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-05-1991
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 143, 154, 207, 208, 209, 214 and 271(1)
(1991)98CTR(AP)49; [1991]190ITR266(AP)
Y. Ratnakar, Adv.
P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This is a reference at the instance of the Revenue. The following question of law has been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for the decision of this court : 'Whether, on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendran, Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Pol ...
Chennai
Mar-04-2002
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 114A; Evidence Act - Sections 323, 324, 366, 376, 376(2), 401 and 506
2003(1)ALT(Cri)27; 2002CriLJ2202
E. Raja, Addl. P. P.
ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. On 13.4.1990 mid night at 2.00 A.M., the victim girl Kalaiselvi P.W.1 aged about 19 years along with her sister P.W.2 aged about 12 years was proceeding towards home after attending the Thiruvizha...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSappani Mohamed Mohideen and anr. Vs. R.V. Sethusubramania Pillai and ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-07-1973
Trusts and Societies
Hindu Law
AIR1974SC740; (1974)1SCC615; [1974]2SCR594
M.K. Ramamurthi and ; J. Ramamurti, ; Advs.
Goswami, J.1. In this appeal we have to go back to a period close upon a passing century to divine what a Hindu Joint Family that had separated at that distant date, thought, contemplated, did and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Dr. Nagarathinam Vs. M. Kalirajan
Chennai
Apr-20-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 12
2001CriLJ3007
O. Venkatachalam, Adv.
ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Before pronouncing the order in this application for quashing on merits, this Court cannot but record a note of anguish over the conduct of Mr. O. Venkatachalam, the learned counsel appearing for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSimon and Another Vs. Thankammal and Another
Chennai
Apr-12-1999
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 11, 100, 105 and 115 -- Order 8, Rule 9 -- Order 6, Rule 17 -- Order 41, Rule 23; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 52
1999(2)CTC705
Mr. O. Venkatachalam, Adv.
ORDER1. The civil revision petition has been filed against the order allowing the application for amendment of the written statement by the learned District Munsif, Eraniel in I.A.No. 133 of 1997 in O.S.No. 2 of 1997...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankaran Narayan Vs. State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Chennai
Mar-05-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 432 and 433; Prisoners Act
2003(2)CTC482
O. Venkatachalam and ;N. Doraiswamy, Advs. in R.T. No. 2/2003 and I. Subramanian, Public Prosecutor in C.A. No. 204/2003
ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The appellants in the appeal stand convicted in S.C. No. 514/2001 on the file of the Additional Court of Sessions, Tuticorin, for offences under Section 302 r/w Section 34 I.P.C. (5 counts) and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Management Coimbatore District Co-operative Milk Producers Union, ...
Chennai
Aug-04-2000
Service
Tamil Nadu Payments of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981 -- Sections 3 and 5; Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Rules, Rules 5; Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, Sections 33(C)(2)
2000(3)CTC397
Mr. O. Venkatachalam, Adv.
ORDER1. Aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court, Coimbatore in C.P.Nos.628 and 868 of 1996 dated 23.12.96 directing the petitioner to pay subsistence allowance of Rs.10,050 and 5,520 respectively, the Management, District Co-operative Milk Producer's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Salzer Spinners Ltd. and Dbv
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Oct-19-2001
Excise
(2002)(147)ELT450Tri(Chennai)
Shri. J. Sankararaman, Shri. S. Venkatachalam
1. Both these Revenue appeals arise from two separate impugned orders.As the issue involved in both the appeals and the arguments advanced by both the sides in these appeals are similar, they are taken up together...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Manju Chemicals
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-15-2002
Excise
(2002)LC574Tri(Chennai)
Shri. Venkatachalam
1. In this Revenue appeal the Revenue is challenging the Commissioner's Order-in-Appeal No. 53/2001, dated 26-3-2001 by which the Commissioner has held that the Revenue has not raised demands in the show cause notice with regard...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadipalli Venkatachellam Vs. Madipalli Suryanarayanamurty and ors.
Chennai
Aug-16-1939
Civil
AIR1941Mad129; (1940)2MLJ520
Mockett, J.1. Defendant 1 is the appellant. He is the son of one Chelamiah who died on 15fch October 1925 at a great age. Defendant 2 is the brother of defendant 1 and the plaintiff is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »