Advanced Search Results
Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Lazor Detergents (P.) Ltd. and ...
Chennai
Apr-07-1994
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81, 82, 108, 108(1), (A) and (H), 111, 111(4) and 155; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 22(A), (A(3)), (A(4)) and (A(6)); MRTP Act, 1969 - Sections 30(A) and (G)
[1994]81CompCas669(Mad)
Swamidurai, J. 1. These appeals are filed against the common order dated October 20, 1993, passed by the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench at Madras, in C.P. Nos. 1 to 11/111/SRB of 1993. The first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.T. Ganapathy Mudaliar and anr. Vs. S.G. Pandurangan and ors.
Company Law Board CLB
Aug-31-1998
Land Acquisition
(1999)96CompCas919
Shri. Vedantham Srinivasan
1. Two shareholder-petitioners claiming to hold about 66 percentage of shares in Esteji Hotels Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the company") have filed this petition under Sections 397, 398, 400, 402, 403 and 404 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsoka Betelnut Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M.C. Sathyavathy and ors.
Chennai
Jan-14-2000
Company
Company Law Board Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 4(2), 26 and 44; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398
[2003]115CompCas603(Mad); [2003]48SCL413(Mad)
Vedantham Srinivasan, Adv. for ;J. Krishnamachari, Adv. for respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 4, ;Karthic Sheshadri, Adv. for respondent Nos. 5 to 9 and ;None for respondent No. 3
B. Akbar Basra Khadiri, J.1. Both the C. M. As. have arisen in this way :The matter relates to Asoka Betelnut Company Pvt. Ltd. The betelnut business was initially started by one Krishna Chetty, who had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Alagammai and ors. Vs. V. Rakkammal
Chennai
Mar-21-1991
Family
(1991)2MLJ86
Mr. R. Vedantham Srinivasan
Nainar Sundaram, J.1. Defendants 1 to 5 in O.S. No. 32 of 1976, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivaganga, are the appellants in this Letters Patent Appeal. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOfficial Liquidator Vs. T. Sudarsan and ors.
Chennai
Dec-13-2002
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(30), 433, 478, 519, 542, 543, 545 and 620A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 130, 260 and 261
[2003]116CompCas88(Mad); [2004]49SCL694(Mad)
R. Vedantham Srinivasan and ;Nalini Chidambaram, Advs. for ;S. Silambanan and ;P.N. George Graham, Advs. for ;Devadasan Sagar, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. Company Application Nos. 888 of 1995 is by the official liquidator appointed by this court as liquidator of Messrs. Dhanalakshmi Funds (India) Ltd., praying for certain directions. Company Application No. 1321 of 1995...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Ravishankar Prasad, A. Sai Vs. Prasad Productions Private
Company Law Board CLB
Sep-01-2005
Land Acquisition
(2007)135CompCas416
1. The petitioners constituting more than one-tenth of the total number of members of M/s Prasad Productions Private Limited ("the Company") have filed this company petition under Sections 235, 397, 398, Schedule XI read with Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhoday Distilleries Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companie ... Overruled
Chennai
Oct-12-2007
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 32, 35, 46, 56, 109 and 109(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 137; Customs Act - Sections 11; Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947; Geographical Indication of Goods Act, 1999 - Sections 26; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 191; Trade Marks Rules
LC2007(3)409; 2008(36)PTC315(Mad)
Mr. Veerendra Thulza Purkar, Dr. Veerendra Thulza Purkar
K. Mohan Ram, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.09.1998...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Indian Bank, Madras Vs. S. Krishnaswamy and Others
Chennai
Feb-15-1989
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 133, 134, 136, 139, 140, 141, 143, 153 and 171; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 8, Rule 6
AIR1990Mad115
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The defendants appeal from a common Judgment of Shanmukham, J., in C.S. Nos. 31 and 33 of 1974.2. Originally these suits were instituted inthe City Civil Court, Madras, and were transferred to this Court....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaheswari Metals and Metal Refinery, Bangalore Vs. the Madras State Sm ...
Chennai
Oct-27-1972
Commercial
Indian Contract Act - Sections 64 and 75; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 55 and 89; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1859 - Sections 111 - Orders VII and 8, Rule 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendement) Act, 1888 - Sections 216; Stamp Act - Sections 27; Equity Act; Madras Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 8
AIR1974Mad39
ORDER1. This is an appeal against the order of remand made by the Additional Judge of the City Civil Court, Madras. The suit (O.S. No. 3216 of 1968) was tried by an Assistant Judge of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Indian Bank, by Its Custodian Vs. S. Krishnaswamy and ors.
Chennai
Feb-15-1989
Contract
(1989)2MLJ46
Bakthavatsalam,J. 1. The defendants appeal from a common judgment of Shanmukham, J., in C.S.Nos.31 and 33 of 1974.2. Originally these suits were instituted in the City Civil Court, Madras, and were transferred to this Court. C.S....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »