Advanced Search Results

State of Rajasthan Vs. Techno Hind Marble and Granite Pvt. Ltd. and an ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2007(1)WLN39

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. D.K. Vaya

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner State of Rajasthan has come up in writ petition against the order dt. 30.03.1993 passed by Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer whereby the writ...

Nirmala Devi Vs. Ravindra Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13

Reported in : I(1999)DMC467

Advocate for Respondent : Vaya, Adv.

R.D. Vyas, J.1. This application is filed for transferring Civil Suit No. 108-A/96 filed by the non-applicant in the Court of District Judge, Ratlam to the Court of Additional District Judge, Kachrod.2. The non-applicant had filed...

State of Kerala vs Nellyodan Geetha

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI TUESDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 18TH POUSHA, 1940 LA.App..No. 249 of 2013 AGAINST...

Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap versus the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1041

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Preet S. Phanse

[2025] 1 S.C.R. 1041 : 2025 INSC 116 Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap v. The State of Maharashtra (Criminal Appeal No. 879 of 2019) 28 January 2025 [B.R. Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra and K.V. Viswanathan,* JJ.] Issue for...

Fatechand Tarachand and anr. Vs. Parashram Maghanmal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6, 43 and 100; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 17, 52, 52(1) and 52(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 64 - Order 21, Rules 43, 46 and 64 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1953Bom101; (1952)54BOMLR757

Advocate for Respondent : Murzban Mistree and ;B.S. Pamnani, Advs.

(1) This is a chamber summons taken out by the Official Assignee of Bombay praying that a warrant of sale issued on January 10, 1951, be quashed and set aside and that the Sheriff of Bombay...

Syndicate Bank Vs. Jaishree Industries and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Banking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 82 and 131; Bill of Exchange Act - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1994Kant315; ILR1994KAR778; 1994(1)KarLJ482

Advocate for Respondent : J. Jesthmal and ;G. Nagarajulu Naidu, Advs.

ORDERShivashankar Baht J. 1. Thefirst defendant in the suit is the appellant herein. The parties are referred to with reference to their rankings in the trial Court hereafter.2. The plaintiff sued defendants for recovery of a...

Vannarath Girijavally vs Arathil Padinhare Purayil Kunhikannan

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 19TH BHADRA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 16/2011 OF SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR PETITIONER/S/PLAINTIFF NO.1:...

Jaiswal Steel Enterprises Pvt. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC488

1. The issue involved in these three appeals filed by M/s. Jaiswal Steel Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. is whether the refund under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is available to them.2. Shri Sekhar Vayas,...

Dilip Vs. Vandana

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9, 10, 13 and 21A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : I(1992)DMC557

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Vaya, Adv.

V.S. Kokje, J.1. This is an application for transfer of a case filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the non-applicant in the Court of the District Judge, Ratlam to the Court of...

Sushila Kurnawat Vs. Rajesh Kurnawat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : I(2005)DMC238

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Vaya, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Awasthy, J.1. The appellant/petitioner has filed the appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the judgment and order dated 17.11.2003 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Khachrod, District Ujjain in Hindu Marriage...