Advanced Search Results
Mohammed Azamathulla Alias Azzu and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Til ...
Karnataka
Jan-14-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 407 and 482
2003CriLJ2661; ILR2003KAR1541
V.Y. Kumar, HCGP
ORDERSreedhar Rao, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., challenging the order of this Court made on administration side at Annexure-A, exercising powers under Section 407 of Cr.P.C., transferred the Session Cases from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPramod Muthalik Vs. the District Magistrate
Karnataka
Jan-31-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 144
2003CriLJ1783; ILR2003KAR1953; 2004(2)KarLJ139
V.Y. Kumar, HCGP
ORDERSreedhar Rao, J. 1. The District Magistrate, Davanagere passed the impugned order debarring the entry of the petitioner in any part of the Davangere District for a period of one month from 4.1.2003 to 3.2.2003.2. Saliently...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayaram Vs. State by Upparpet Police Station
Karnataka
Oct-28-2002
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 156 and 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 399
2003CriLJ1422; 2003(2)KarLJ630
V.Y. Kumar, High Court Government Pleader
ORDERK. Sreedhar Rao, J. 1. The petition filed under Section 439 of the Cr. P.O. for grant of bail. The petitioner along with other accused is charge-sheeted for committing offence punishable under Sections 399 and 400...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dattaraj Vs. State by Mahalaxmipuram Police and anr.
Karnataka
Jan-16-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 225, 301, 301(2) and 302
2003CriLJ3212; 2003(4)KarLJ556
V.Y. Kumar, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent-1, ;A.H. Bhagawan, Adv. for Respondent-2 in Cri. P. No. 4784 of 2002 and ;M.B. Ravikumar, Adv. for Respondent-2 in Cri. P. No. 4785 of 2002
ORDERK. Sreedhar Rao, J.1. These petitions are filed under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. challenging the order of the Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore passed in Cri. Misc. No. 2675 and 2774 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Praveen Bhai Thogadia Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Karnataka
Feb-13-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 20, 144, 144(1), 144(5), 144(6) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
2003CriLJ1769; ILR2003KAR3175; 2003(3)KarLJ435
V.Y. Kumar, High Court Government Pleader
ORDERK. Sreedhar Rao, J.1. The order of Additional District Magistrate, Dakshina Kannada District passed in No. MAG (2) CR 352/2002-03, dated 7-2-2003 is in challenge in these proceedings. Under the order, the petitioner is debarred from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Praveen Bai Thogadia Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Karnataka
Feb-14-2003
CriminalConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 144; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 153A and 295A
2003CriLJ4502; 2003(6)KarLJ48
V.Y. Kumar, High Court Govt. Pleader
ORDERK. Sreedhar Rao, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the District Magistrate, Belgaum, debarring him for a period of 15 days from 6 a.m. on 12-2-2003 to 6 a.m. on 26-2-2003. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManohar and ors. Vs. the Commissioner for Cane Development and the Dir ...
Karnataka
Mar-22-2002
Civil
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966; Karnataka Sugarcane (Regulation of Distribution) (Raibag) Order, 1978
AIR2002Kant330; [2003]115CompCas695(Kar); ILR2002KAR4007; 2002(4)KarLJ565
V.Y. Kumar, High Court Government Pleader for Respondents 1 and 2
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all growers of sugarcane in Belgaum District coming within the notified area of the third respondent, the Raibag Co-operative Sugar Factory (Limited) and within the reserved area meant for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok V. David Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-23-2005
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 5 and 5(2)
2005(5)KarLJ584
V.Y. Kumar, Govt. Adv. for Respondent-1 and ;N. Devadas, Central Government Standing, for Respondents-2 to 4
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. In this writ petition, what essentially falls for decision making is whether the direction issued by the Apex Court in its judgment dated 10-5-1996 in Civil Appeal Nos. 8391 and 8393 of 1996...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMubeen Pasha Vs. the Managing Director, Bangalore Electricity Supply C ...
Karnataka
Aug-14-2009
Civil
Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 - Sections 5 and 12
2009(6)KarLJ396
V.Y. Kumar, Adv. for Respondents-1 and 2 and ;G. Nagarajulu Naidu, Adv. for Respondent-3
ORDERAjit J. Gunjal, J.1. The petitioner is questioning the awarding of additional work in favour of the third respondent pursuant to Annexures-F1 to F16 and also for a writ of mandamus to the concerned respondents to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyed Nisar Ahmed Vs. the Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Cor ...
Karnataka
Aug-22-2003
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168, 171 and 173; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27
II(2004)ACC259; 2003ACJ1898; 2003(5)KarLJ186
V.Y. Kumar, Adv. in M.F.A. No.359 of 2002, ;S.P. Shankar, Sr. Counsel and ;H.R. Renuka, Adv. in M.F.A. No. 817 of 2002
S.R. Nayak, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and award dated 31-12-2001 passed in M.V.C. No. 1420 of 1994 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Additional Judge (SCCH-20), Mayo...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »