Advanced Search Results

Suresh Chand Sharma Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 300; Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 173, 313, 161

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jaideep Malik; Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal; Ms. Anu Bagai; Mr. Bhuvan Mishra; Mr. Aditya Wadhwa, Advs.

1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. CRL.A. No. 385/2011 2. By the judgment dated 14.12.2010 and the order on sentence dated 15.12.2010 the Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable...

General Manager Telecom District, Wg, Eluru and ors. Vs. N. Lalithamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 48-A, 48-A(1), 48-A(2), 48-A(4) and 48(3-A)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD533; 2002(1)ALT119; [2002(94)FLR20]

Advocate for Respondent : T.V.V.S. Murthy, Adv.

A.R. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. Heard Sri C.V.Ramulu, the learned senior Standing Counsel for Central Government, appearing for the petitioners and Mr. T.V.V.S.Murthy, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. The General Manager, Telecom District, West Godavari, Eluru...

Smt. Kumari Bai and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr. Etc.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 401 and 401(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 319 and 319(3); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80, 80(1), 80(2) and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 32, 226 and 300A

Reported in : AIR2006Chh52; 2006(3)MPHT42(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. A.G.,; Sumesh Bajaj, Dy. Govt. Adv.,;

S.R. Nayak, C.J.1. In these writ petitions the constitutional validity of Section 401 of Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') has been questioned so far it takes away the right of an aggrieved...

A.K. Construction Company Vs. the State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh) and ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 7 and 19

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT15(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General

A.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This revision is under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (for short 'the Act') against the award dated 19-5-1996 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal in Reference...

Utkal Hydrocarbons and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21

Reported in : AIR2006Chh36; 2006(2)MPHT68(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V.S. Murthy, Adv. General a/b., Somesh Bajaj, Govt. Adv.,; Prashant Mishra, Sr. Counsel,;

A.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This batch of writ petitions relates to allotment of bye products of Bhilai Steel Plant as raw materials to different Industries located in the State of Chhattisgarh and were heard analogously and are...

H. Rajender Vs. Managing Director, Agricultural Co-operative Associati ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984; Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishment Act - Sections 47; Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Article 16; HACA Employees Service Rules - Rules 1 and 4; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rule 22; HACA Employees Service Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 16, 16(1), 16(4), 16(4A), 16(4B), 46 and 335

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD184; 2007(4)ALT769

Advocate for Respondent : G. Bhaskar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;G.P. for Respondent No. 2

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. The petitioner, a junior Assistant in the Hyderabad Agricultural Co-operative Association Limited, (herein after referred to as HACA), seeks promotion as a senior assistant, with retrospective effect from 14-12-1994, against the backlog vacancies...

Smt. G. Lalita W/O Shri G.V.S.S. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

1. Challenge is made to order dated 25th July, 2006 whereby applicant has been transferred to Kolkata along with the post.2. Factual matrix is that applicant appointed as 'Computer' in the Central Statistical Organization (hereinafter referred...

Anil Tiwari Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(1)MPHT54(CG)

ORDERSatish K. Agnihotri, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the validity of the order dated 30-5-2001 (P-1), passed by the Superintendent of Police, Raigarh, whereunder punishment of withholding of one increment with cumulative effect, having...

Dr. Naval Singh Chandel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(3)MPHT34(CG)

ORDERSatish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. By this petition the petitioner challenges the validity of the impugned order dated 19-10-2006 (Annexure P-l), passed by the respondent No. 3 Collector, Bilaspur, wherein the respondent No. 5 Medical Officer...

Ch. Narasimha Swamy Vs. the Senior Superintendent of Post

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard Mr. T.V.V.S Murthy, Ld. Counsel representing Mr. K.Venkateswara Rao, Ld. Counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. V.Rajeswara Rao, Ld. Counsel appearing for the official respondents and Mr. S. Rama Krishna Rao, Ld. Counsel...