Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v v radhakrishnan · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.143 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 23 2016

M/s. Al Rostamani International Exchange, Represented by its Head Inte ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: O.S.A.No.281 of 2009 filed under Order 36 Rule 1 of O.S.Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order passed by this Court in Company Application No.2296 of 2008 in C.P.No.17 of 2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1956

S.T. Sahib Vs. N. Hasan Ghani Sahib and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-10-1956

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33, 157 and 158; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 476; Legal Practitioners Act - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR1957Mad646

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Venugopalachariar, ;T.V. Balakrishnan and ;S. Ramchandra Iyer, Advs.

Ramaswami, J. 1. These are connected appeals directed against the decrees and judgments of the learned Subordinate Judge of Tirunelveli in O. S. Nos. 113 of 1950 and 25 of 1951.2. The facts are: The first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2004

Vijayaraj Vs. Githeyon Raj and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-2004

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : [2004]122CompCas393(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V. Selvaraj, Adv. for the first respondent

R. Banumathi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of acquittal in S. T. C. No. 2445 of 1991 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pad-manabhapuram. By the judgment dated April 16, 1992, the first respondent/...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 1957

In Re: P.K. Adimoolam Chettiar,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-1957

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1957]8STC741(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for P.S. Kailasam, Public Prosecutor, ;V.V. Radhakrishnan ;and K. Veeraswami, Assistant Government Pleader

ORDERRamaswami, J1. These are two connected revision cases which are preferred against the convictions and sentences by the learned Additional First Class Magistrate, Vellore, in C. C. Nos. 177 and 178 of 1955, and which were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1958

In Re: Kandaswami Goundan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-25-1958

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : (1958)IIMLJ41; [1958]9STC542(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

ORDERRamaswami, J. 1. These are two connected revisions preferred against the orders made by the learned Additional First Class Magistrate of Salem in C. C. Nos. 663 and 664 of 1957 on his file.2. The petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 1962

In Re: Rajoo

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-26-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 411; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1963Mad82; 1963CriLJ300

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for Public Prosecutor

ORDERSadasivam, J.1. Petitioner Rajoo alias Idly Rajoo has been convicted under Section 379 read with Section 75, I. P. C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months. The learned advocate for the petitioner argued the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 1962

In Re: Jadayandi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-28-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 423(1)

Reported in : AIR1963Mad83; 1963CriLJ301

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for Public Prosecutor

ORDERSadasivam, J.1. Reference by the District Magistrate, North Arcot, to quash the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Cheyyar, directing re-trial of accused 5 Jadayandi and accused 7 Subramaniam in C. C. No. 371 of 1961 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1998

Abdul Jamil and 5 Others Vs. the Secretary, Income-tax Department, New ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-1998

Subject : direct taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 -- Sections 28, 222, 281 and 287 (as amended 1975) -- Rule 2, 16(2), 48 and 51 Schedule II; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 53 and 100; Income Tax Rules, Rules 2 and 16 -- Schedule II; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) -- Sections 64

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC547

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Kala Ramesh, Adv.

ORDER1 The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein. They filed the suit O.S.No.226 of 1975 on the file of the Sub-Court, Dindugul for declaration that the purchase made by one Haji Mohammed Rahamathulla Rowther on 27.6.68...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1956

Sadasivam Vs. State of Madras, by the Asst. Inspector Labour X Circle, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-1956

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 6 and 11; Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 11(1); Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1957Mad144; 1957CriLJ374; (1957)ILLJ524Mad

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

ORDERRamaswami, J.1. This is a Criminal Revision preferred against the conviction and sentence by the learned Second Presidency Magistrate, Madras, in C. C. No. 11265 of 195,5.2. The facts are The petitioner M. Sadasivam is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1958

In Re: Annakamu Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 351, 352, 353 and 503

Reported in : AIR1959Mad342; 1959CriLJ1084

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

ORDERRamaswami, J. 1. It was argued by the learned counsel Mr. Ramachandran that when the revision petitioner threatened to kill the Revenue Inspector forlawfully distraining his properties, that would notamount to the offence of assault, for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial