Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v v radhakrishna · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.191 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 02 1991

Veeramallu Venkataramayya Vs. Bathina Venkateswara Rao @ Pamarthi Venk ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-02-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act - Sections 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT462

Advocate for Respondent : E.V.S.S. Acharyulu, Adv.

Eswara Prasad, J.1. The Appellant filed the suit for declaration of his title 'and for recovery of possession of the suit properties by virtue of a gift deed in his favour said to have been executed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2002

Ramanivas Gupta and ors. Vs. Maliram

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-16-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Stamp Rules, 1925 - Rule 6(2); Stamp Act - Sections 35 and 36; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16 and 29

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD362; 2003(3)ALT787

C.Y. Somayajulu, J. 1. Since all these appeals arise out of OS No. 856 of 1985, they are being disposed of by a common judgment. For the sake of convenience I would refer to the parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1998

Abdul Jamil and 5 Others Vs. the Secretary, Income-tax Department, New ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-1998

Subject : direct taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 -- Sections 28, 222, 281 and 287 (as amended 1975) -- Rule 2, 16(2), 48 and 51 Schedule II; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 53 and 100; Income Tax Rules, Rules 2 and 16 -- Schedule II; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) -- Sections 64

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC547

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Kala Ramesh, Adv.

ORDER1 The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein. They filed the suit O.S.No.226 of 1975 on the file of the Sub-Court, Dindugul for declaration that the purchase made by one Haji Mohammed Rahamathulla Rowther on 27.6.68...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 12 1958

Thirunavukkarasu and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-12-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 107, 110, 112, 117(3), 118, 250, 342 and 403; Constitution of India - Article 20; Evidence Act - Sections 54 and 157

Reported in : AIR1959Mad339; 1959CriLJ998; (1959)2MLJ596

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Radhakrishna, Adv. for Public Prosecutor

ORDERRamaswami, J.1. This revision is sought to be filed against the order made by the Ex-offcio First Class Magistrate, Chidambaram, in M.C. No. 2 of 1938, under Section 117(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1994

Ramaswamy Gounder Vs. T.S. Ramaswamy Gounder and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 97(1) - Order 21, Rule 90; Central (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1995(2)CTC442; (1995)IIMLJ413

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Venkatachari, ;P.S. Srisailam and ;S. Gopalan, Advs.

ORDERK.A. Swami, C.J.1. The common question that arises for consideration in these C.R.Ps is as to whether the proviso inserted by the High Court of Madras Amendment in Rule 90, Order 21, of the Code of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1994

Ramaswamy Gounder and ors. Vs. T.S. Ramaswamy Gounder and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1994

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ413

ORDER1. The common question that arises for consideration in these C.R. Ps. is as to whether the proviso inserted by the High Court of Madras Amendment in Rule 90, Order 21 of the Code of Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial