Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v somasundaram · Page 1 of about 260 results (0.118 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 30 1956

Pitambar Das Vs. Rajmata Srimati Shanti Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-30-1956

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 36 and 61 - Schedule - Article 1; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 13, Rule 4; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 19

Reported in : AIR1957HP23

Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. The suit, out of which this second appeal by a defendant, has arisen, has had a chequered career. Rajmata Shanti Devi of Bushahr instituted a suit against Pitambar Das (the appellant in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1932

Shaikh Yakub Harunkhan Vs. Mahadev Narayan Prabhu Desai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1932

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom509; (1932)34BOMLR987

Rangnekar, J.1. This appeal must fail. Mr. Desai takes a preliminary point, but I do not express any opinion on it. On the merits the appellants have no case. It appears that a decree for partition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1938

Basawantappa Mallapa Bhopalpur Vs. Mallappa Mallappa Bhopalpur

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-13-1938

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1939Bom178; (1939)41BOMLR268

Wassoodew, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the decree of the First Class Subordinate Judge of Dharwar granting possession to him of half share only in those properties of the family which were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 05 1940

Ningauda Girimallappa Patil Vs. Nabisaheb Abalal Patil

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-05-1940

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : AIR1942Bom263; (1942)44BOMLR543

Divatia, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit to recover possession of certain properties. The facts which have led to the appeal are shortly as follows:-2. Defendants Nos. 1 to 4 are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2015

Leharchand and Others Vs. Gulabchand and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Sep-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayers: This Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 07.11.2014 passed in O.S. No.37/2010 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1960

The Accountant General, Madras Vs. Singamuthu Konar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-18-1960

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 52

Reported in : AIR1961Mad288

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Desikan and ;K. Raman, Advs.

ORDERRamachandra Iyer, J.1. This is a case taken up by this Court suo motu to revise the order of the Subordinate Judge in E. P. No. 28 of 1957 in S. C, S. No. 199 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2020

M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-29-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF MAY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.37571/2013(GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/s CHALET HOTELS LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 2008

The Tamil Nadu Consumers Cooperative Federation Ltd. Vs. T.A. Jayalaks ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-21-2008

Subject : PropertyCommercial

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 - Sections 9 to 11, 11(1), 11(3), 11(5), 12, 12(7), 24(1) and 33; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 300A

Reported in : (2009)2MLJ53

Advocate for Respondent : Nageswara Rao, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Ramesh, Adv. for Respondents 1, 2, 3 and 7, ;R. Thirugnanam, Spl. Government Pleader assisted by P. Gurunathan, Government Adv. for Respondents 8 to 10, ;R. Yashod

D. Murugesan, J.1. As the issues raised and argued in both the writ appeal and the writ petition are one and the same, they are taken up together for disposal by this common judgment. For convenience,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2012

The State, Represented by Inspector of Police Vs. S. Saminathan and Ot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-24-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(2) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai in C.C.No.176 of 1997 dated 11.3.2005.) 1. This appeal has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2005

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-06-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 26B; Finance Act, 1999; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 33C; Revenue Recovery Act

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT65

Advocate for Respondent : Raju Joseph, Spl. Government Pleader

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Question that has come up for consideration in this case is whether a decree obtained by a bank before the introduction of Section 26B of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 would...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial