Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v s subramanian · Page 1 of about 22 results (0.150 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 05 2003

Dr. Shantha Vs. Sharada

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 63

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ188

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Subramanian, Adv.

N. Dhinakar, J. 1. P. Sundaramurthy died on 6.1.1981 leaving behind him a legal battle to be fought by his two daughters, Shantha and Saradha, over a Will dated 6.12.1980 and also a son by name...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 1991

G.S.R. Krishnamurthi Vs. M. Govindaswamy, Income-tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-13-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72(3), 132, 132(4), 136, 139, 142, 143, 148, 269A, 269F, 269-I, 269P(1), 269S, 269AB, 271, 271(1), 271(4A), 273A, 275A, 276, 276A, 276B, 276C, 276C(1), 276D, 276E, 276AA, 276CC, 276DD, 277, 278, 278A, 278C, 279, 279(1) and 279(1A); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 34, 37, 109, 120B, 193, 196 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 26; Finance Act, 1985

Reported in : (1992)104CTR(Mad)143; [1992]195ITR137(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K. Ramasamy, Adv.

Janarthanam, J. 1. Thiru G. S. R. Krishnamurthi (the petitioner herein) is accused No. 1 in E. O. C. C. No. 302 of 1984 on the file of the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1995

N. Raju Reddiar and anr. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Represen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-06-1995

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ561

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Rajeswaran

AR. Lakshmanan, J. 1. The plaintiffs, who succeeded in part before the learned single Judge of this Court, are the appellants in the above appeal and the respondents in the memorandum of cross objections filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 29 1992

B. Sivaraman and Others Vs. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 169, 173, 177, 178, 179, 184, 189, 193, 194, 195, 257, 257(1A), 263, 264, 284 and 505

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas198(Mad)

Arumugham, J.1. The applicants/plaintiffs have filed this application under Order 14, rule 8 of the Original Side Rules, read with Order 39, rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the respondent/first defendant, seeking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2002

P.G. Vivekanandan and ors. and Archean Granites Ltd. Vs. R.P.S. Benefi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 531A and 536; Income-tax Act

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas649(Mad); (2006)2CompLJ134(Mad); [2004]49SCL671(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Nalini Chidambaram, Adv.

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. Application No. 2047 of 2000 has been taken out in C. P. No. 233 of 1999 by Archean Granites Ltd. praying this court to hold that the sale deed executed by R. P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 1992

Dr. Kamala Dakshinamurthi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees Represented b ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-12-1992

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ604

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.S. Subramaniam

Lakshmanan, J.1. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 have filed the above suit in a representative capacity after obtaining necessary permission from this Court under Order 1, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In Appln. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1997

K. Md. Farooq Ahmed and anr. Vs. Fortran Cirkit Electronics P.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Feb-12-1997

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1998)92CompCas498

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. V. S. Subramanian

1. This is an application under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956.(hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), seeking rectification of the register of members of Fortran Cirkit Electronics Private Limited, the first respondent (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1989

income-tax Officer Vs. Abdul Razack and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-06-1989

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 116, 132, 132(1), 132(1A), 132(5), 132(11), 132(12), 132B, 174, 175, 269UA(1A), 271, 273A, 273A(2), 275A, 276, 276A, 276B, 276C, 276C(1), 276C(2), 276D, 276E, 276AA, 276BB, 276CC, 276DD, 277, 278, 279 and 279(1)

Reported in : [1990]181ITR414(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : Habib Ansari, Adv. and ;Public Prosecutor

Bhaskar Rao, J.1. This revision case is filed against the judgment of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad, in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 2425 of 1987 in Civil Case No. 94 of 1987, dated February...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1998

M/S. Tribol Engineering Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-12-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11, 12, 20(4) 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 8, Rule 6A

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC385

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G. Subramanian, Senior Counsel for R1, Adv.

ORDERJudgement pronounced by Shivappa, J. 1. The C.M.P.No. 10631 of 1998 has been filed for removal of respondent No.2 Arbitrator on the ground of reasonable apprehension of bias and to appoint an independent Arbitrator in his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1998

Ram Darash Dosad @ R.D. Dosad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Decided on : May-01-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

1. The applicant in this original application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, was working as a semi-skilled worker in the Eastern Railway. On 17.8.80 he was placed under suspension in contemplation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial