Advanced Search Results
Hardatt Sharma Vs. Jaikishen Shamlal and Sons and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Oct-09-1982
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11 - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 21, Rule 50(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 18
AIR1983J& K29
V.S. Malhotra and; H.L. Bhagotra, Advs.
I.K. Kotwal, J.1. This judgment will govern the disposal of Civil Misc. Appeal No. 90 of 1981 and Civil Misc. Petition No. 152 of 1982, moved on behalf of the State of Jammu and Kashmir for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYadu Ram Alias Anand Sagar Vs. State
Jammu and Kashmir
Apr-28-1972
Criminal
1972CriLJ1464
S.M.F. Ali, C.J.1.The appellant has been convicted under Section 376, RPC and sentenced seven years' simple imprisonment by the learned Sessions Judge Jammu for having committed rape on P. W. 2 Shakti Dhar. a small girl...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnant Ram and anr. Vs. Chairman, Panchayati Adalat, Tehsil and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Mar-13-1969
Criminal
1970CriLJ303
ORDERJaswant Singh, J.1. This is a petition for issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the Pachayati Adalat, Bhaya, Tehsil. Hiranagar dated 10-8-1966.2. The facts material for the purpose of this petition are:On...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gopalkishan Son of Bhimsen Sachdeva and anr. Vs. the Sales Tax Officer ...
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-25-1967
Sales Tax
[1968]21STC109(MP)
A.P. Sen, Adv.-General and ; K.K. Dubey, Government Adv.
ORDERR.J. Bhave, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek a writ of certiorari for quashing an assessment order dated 4th October, 1966, passed by the respondent No. 1. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Apsara Processors (P) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Dec-27-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)92TTJ(Ahd.)645
1. In the above mentioned cases, the Hon'ble President of Tribunal has referred the following question for the consideration of Special Bench : "Whether penalty can be levied Under Section 271(1)(c) in cases where the assessed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdditional Commissioner of Vs. Glad Investments (P.) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jun-09-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)102ITD227(Delhi)
1. This appeal has been filed by the revenue on 28-6-2001 against the order of the learned CIT (Appeals)-I, New Delhi, dated 23-3-2001 in the case of the assessee in relation to assessment order under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes and Others Vs. V.S. Malhotra
Delhi
Nov-10-1980
Direct Taxation
Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1), 288(4) and 297(2)
ILR1981Delhi428
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J. 1. The single question in this appeal is whether the provisions of s. 288(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), which empower the Commissioner of Income-tax to disqualify a practitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Delhi Vs. Maya Rani Punj
Delhi
Dec-21-1972
Direct Taxation
Income tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1)
ILR1973Delhi605; [1973]92ITR394(Delhi)
M.R.A. Ansari, J. (1) The following question has been referred to this Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, New ...
Delhi
Nov-10-1980
Direct Taxation
Income tax Act, 1961 - Sections 288(4)
[1981]128ITR543(Delhi)
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J. (1) The single question in this appeal is whether the provisions of section 288(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (Act of 1961) which empower the Commissioner of Income Tax to disqualify...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.S. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Feb-15-1972
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1), 288(4) and 297(2)
[1973]88ITR110(Delhi)
G.C. Sharma, ; Randir Chawla, ; R.P. Soni and ;
Dalip K. Kapur, J.1. The petitioner, an advocate on the rolls of the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh, has instituted this writ petition to challenge a disqualification imposed on him under Section 288(4) of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »