Advanced Search Results

Vidarbha Mining Association Vs. Central Government Tribunal and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. G.G. Modak, Shri. Modak

Oral Judgment On Preliminary Issue. (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) Heard Shri S.V. Manohar, learned Senior Counsel with Shri V.S. Kukday, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.K. Mishra, learned A.S.G.I. for respondent no.2, learned A.G.P. for respondent...

M/s. Krishnagangaa Consultants, through its Proprietor, Gajender C. Su ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment:1. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties. These appeals can be disposed of by the common judgment as the same issues are involved. The proceedings under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short...

Subhash Joshi and anr. Vs. Mohd. Sultan S/O Abdul Gani and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Provincial Small Causes Court Act, 1887 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 25, 25A, 26, 26A, 26(1), 26A(1), 26(4), 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 7, 15, 96, 96(4), 115 and 295 - Order 7, Rule 10; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28; Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 5 and 12; Presidency Small Causes Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 19, 41 and 41(1); Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 133(1) and 136

Reported in : AIR2006Bom153; 2006(2)MhLj612

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Kukday, Adv. For respondent No. 1

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The only question to be decided is whether Small Causes Court is competent to grant relief of injunction in dispute between landlord and tenant while exercising jurisdiction under Section 26 of Provincial Small...