Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v s deshpande · Page 1 of about 490 results (0.098 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 12 1980

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Ranipur Vs. Amar Nath Bhan Prakash

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-1980

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20

Reported in : (1982)1SCC625

P.N. Bhagwati and; S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, JJ.1. It appears from the order of the High Court impugned in the appeal that the High Court has not correctly appreciated the position that the question whether there...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1960

Sahebrao Madhavrao Vs. Rangarao Dadarao and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-1960

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1962Bom1; (1961)63BOMLR411; ILR1961Bom768

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Deshpande, Adv.

(1) This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by plaintiff for possession of certain immoveable properties which originally belonged to one Madhavrao.(2) The following pedigree will show the relationship of the persons to whom reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 1995

Sayed Ahmed Ali Kari Alias Munna and Etc Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-07-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 300, 302, 304, 326 and 387; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - 1973 - Sections 161; Evidence Act - Sections 32

Reported in : 1996(3)BomCR153; (1995)97BOMLR435; 1995CriLJ3585

Sahai, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same set of facts, we propose disposing them of by a common judgment. Vide judgment and order dated 12-8-1993, Shri V. C. Singh, Additional Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 27 2012

Sau. Shailaja Rajendra Badwaik and Others Vs. Hon'ble Minister, Depart ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-27-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jagtap

By the present petition, the petitioners have put to challenge the order dated 30.10.2010 passed by the State Government in Revision No. FLR-1310/RA-46/SE-2, by which the revisional authority has set aside the orders dated 20.2.2010 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 1959

Bhimrao Ekanth and anr. Vs. Patilbua Ramkishan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-1959

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 19(1) and 372

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR574

Advocate for Respondent : A. Jahagirdar and ;R.R. Jahagirdar, Advs.

Mudholkar, J.(1) Two questions bearing on the law of pre-emptions have been referred to us by the learned chief Justice on the recommendation of Justice Miabhoy. these questions are:-(1) Has the right of pre-emption become void...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2004

Transport Nagar Free Zone Co-operative Society Limited Vs. Nagpur Impr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-07-2004

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Nagpur Improvement Trust Act; Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal Rules, 1983 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 7, 22, 23 and 26; Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal Rules, 1955 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR643; 2005(3)BomCR485

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Mishra, Adv. for respondent No. 1-N.I.T. and ;T.D. Khade, A.G.P., for respondent No. 2-State

Sinha D.D., J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1-N.I.T. and learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent No. 2-State.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1975

Bar Council of Maharashtra Vs. M.V. Dabholkar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-13-1975

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 3(2), 6, 6(1), 9, 10, 35 to 44 and 49; Advocate (Amendment) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1975SC2092; (1975)2SCC702; [1976]1SCR306

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Dabolkar, ; Z.F. Bootwala, ; Urmila Sirir, ;

A.N. Ray, C.J.1. These appeals were placed before this Bench for consideration of the question whether the Bar Council of a State is 'a person aggrieved' to maintain an appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1993

Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka (Deceased) Through Lrs. Vs. Jasjit Singh an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211(1), 217, 222, 223, 224, 227, 273, 276, 280, 294, 295 and 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2, 2(11), 9 and 33 - Order 22, Rule 10; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 8

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT13(SC); 1993(2)BLJR1193; JT1993(2)SC341; 1993(2)SCALE146; (1993)2SCC507; [1993]2SCR454; MANU/SC/0496/1993

Advocate for Respondent : V.R. Reddy, Additional Solicitor General, ; P. Chidambaram, Senior Adv., ;

K. Ramaswamy, J.1. Shri Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka was involved in several suits and one of which is the pending appeal at his behest. He died on November 25, 1985 leaving behind last Will dated October 29,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1976

Tribhuvan Nath Bhargava Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-03-1976

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Police Service (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1954 - Rule 4

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi1

Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.(1) The petitioner, Tribhuvan Nath Bhargava, is an Assistant Inspector General of Police (CID) Bhopal. He is 46 years of age. He is a member of the Indian Police Service. He was directly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1987

Pathandhare Anveshan Grahanirman Sanstha Maryadit (Proposed) Through I ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal Rules, 1955 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 13(2)

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR596

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Kherdekar, Adv.

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. It will be convenient to take up these three petitions together for decision as the facts are identical. In all the three cases the petitioners were allotted certain land for being converted into...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial