Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v ramaswami · Page 1 of about 2,283 results (0.383 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 26 1926

Emperor Vs. Kalia Amra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR168

Patkar, J.1. In this case sixteen accused wore tried before the Sessions Judge of Broach on charges under Sections 224, 147, 332 and 333, Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case was that accused Nos. 1, 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2016

P. Krishnamoorthy and Others Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Aug-17-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned orders in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-1; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2 respectively,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1958

The Tamilnad Non-gazetted Government Officers Union, Madras and anr. V ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-23-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 2, 11 and 11(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1959Mad55; (1958)2MLJ395

Advocate for Respondent : V. Ramaswami, Adv. for ;Addl. Govt. Pleader

1. This is a reference at the instance of the Registrar of this court as to whether the proposed appeal should validly be entertained on the appellate side of this court. Certain ministerial employees of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 1990

Sulubai and anr. Vs. Kerba Bivaji Shinde and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-18-1990

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Section 32(1)

Reported in : 1990Supp(1)SCC751

Dr. Dr. T.K. Thommen and; V. Ramaswami, JJ.1. Having heard counsel on both sides and perused the records, we are of the view that the High Court was justified in remanding the case. However, it is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1995

Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division Vs. Laghubhai Nanubhai and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-28-1995

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC583

T.K. Thommen,; V. Ramaswamy and; R.M. Sahai, JJ.1. Heard counsel on both sides. The possession of the land in question was taken over by the Government under an agreement dated March 7, 1963. Subsequently a notification...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2016

V. Paramasiva Gounder Vs. R. Jayakrishnan and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-24-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree as made in A.S.No.58 of 2005 dated 07.03.2006 on the file of the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1950

Venkatarama Naicker Vs. Ramasami Naicker and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-24-1950

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 9, 34, 53 and 54; Debt Law; Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1938 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1952Mad504a; (1951)IIMLJ32

Advocate for Respondent : V. Ramaswami Iyer, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a revision petition under Section 75 of the Provincial insolvency Act, by one Venkatarama Naicker, hereinafter called the opposing creditor, against the judgment & decree of the Dist. J. of Tirunelveli in C.M.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1942

Jivatlal Purtapshi Vs. Lalbhai Fulchand Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-1942

Subject : ContractCivil

Reported in : AIR1942Bom251; (1942)44BOMLR495

Beaumont, C.J.1. This is an appeal from a decision of Mr. Justice B. J. Wadia. The plaintiffs sue upon a promissory note dated November 10, 1937, and headed 'Ahmedabad'. The note is in these terms :On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1969

Southarn Chemical Works Vs. Mohamed HuseIn FakruddIn Maniar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-1969

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 205; Drugs Act, 1940 - Sections 18; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules - Rule 61; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 19 and 21; United Provinces Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954

Reported in : AIR1970Bom128; (1970)72BOMLR156; ILR1970Bom645

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Naik, Adv.

Patel, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal against the dismissal of his suit for damages and it arises under the following circumstances:2. The plaintiff-firm manufactures Diamond Apicin and Diamond Jantpudis at Miraj. The defendant is a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 26 1943

Bhavani Shankar Joshi Vs. Gordhandas Jamnadas

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-26-1943

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR228

George Rankin, J.1. This appeal arises out of an application made under Rule 16 of Order XXI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.16. Where a decree... is transferred by assignment in writing or by operation of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial