Advanced Search Results
Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-13-1976
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28
AIR1977Bom99
R.W. Adik, Adv. General, M.M. Qazi and Naik, A.G.P.
Masodkar, J. 1. These 2661 cases have clogged the Court's corridors for considerable time, challenging the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Radheshyam Motilal Khandelwal and ...
Mumbai
Sep-12-1973
Insurance
Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 2(6-B) and 3(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28
AIR1974Bom228; 1974MhLJ319
V.R. Padhye and ;R.M. Joharapurkar, Advs.
Chandurkar, J. 1. This is an appeal by the defendant, the New India Assurance Company Limited, Bombay, challenging a decree for Rs. 16,494.80 passed against them in favour of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claimed to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOfficial Liquidator, Nagpur Glass Works Ltd. Vs. (In Liquidation) V.D. ...
Mumbai
Feb-25-1970
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 48, 115, 235, 477, 477(5), 477(6), 478, 488, 534 and 543
(1971)73BOMLR333; [1971]41CompCas524(Bom); 1970MhLJ686
C.P. Kalele, ;Y.S. Athale, ;B.A. Wazalwar, ;Shanker Anand, ;V.H. Chati, ;V.R. Padhye and ;A.S. Bobde, Advs.
Nain, J.1. These are two applications for the renovation of the ex parte order dated 27th August 1969, for the examination of the directors of the Nagpur Glass Works Ltd. - a company under winding-up under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ranchoddas and anr. Vs. Gupta Brass Stores and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-23-1983
Tenancy
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 12(2); ;Central Provinces and Bearer Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949
AIR1983Bom455; 1983MhLJ933
V.R. Padhye, Adv.
ORDER1. The point that falls for determination in the present petition is whether provisions of S. 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 ('the Act of 1963' for short) apply to the application for review by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarshadbhai Shah and anr. Vs. Rani Kamla Raje Wd/O Kunwar Jaisinghrao ...
Mumbai
Apr-04-1988
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3
1988(3)BomCR166; 1988MhLJ874
V.R. Padhye, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ; A. Bade, Adv. for respondent No. 3 in FA 195, for No. 2 in FA 196/83, ; K.R. Gohokar, Adv. for respondent No. 1 in A.F 195 and for No. 10 in FA 196/83
M.M. Qazi, J.1. The impugned Order has been passed by the Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nagpur, on the basis of the compromise petition on 11-3-1983. There is no dispute that the compromise petition was not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›