Advanced Search Results
D.Johnrose Vs. Chidambara Vinayagar Pillaiyar
Chennai
Nov-12-2011
Land Acquisition
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 41(j); Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 54; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 96 to 105; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Orders 39, 41 Rules 1, 2, 31, 23; Transfer of Property Act - Section 53A
1. The Appellant/Plaintiff has filed the present Second Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment and Decree dated 13.12.2005 in A.S.No.90 of 2005 passed by the Learned II Additional Sub Judge, Nagercoil.2. The First Appellate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Civil Supplies, Corporation Employees Union, (Regn. No. 325 ...
Chennai
Mar-01-1999
Labour and Industrial
Labour Law -- Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen ) Act. 1981 -- Sections 3 and 33- A
1999(3)CTC325
Mr. V. Perumal, Adv.
Judgment Pronounced by P. Sathasivam, J.1. Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Employees Union represented by its General Secretary and for others have filed the above writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to regularise the services...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (intavh), Rep. by ...
Chennai
Nov-17-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article - 300A
2003(4)CTC513
V. Perumal, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;P. Bagyalakshmi, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, ;A. L. Somayaji, Senior Counsel for ;R. Yashod Vardhan, Adv. for Respondent No. 3
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, C.J. 1. This writ petition has been filed as a pro bono publico seeking restraint against the 3rd respondent from exercising her rights over the property, in which the Madras Club is situated....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
V. Srinivasa Ayyangar Vs. the State of Madras and anr.
Chennai
Apr-04-1952
Property
Tenancy Law; Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 - Sections 3(2); Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 20
AIR1953Mad190; (1952)2MLJ314
Government Pleader
1. This is an application for issuing a writ of certiorari, and for quashing the proceedings taken by the respondents under the Madras Acts 30 of 1947 and 26 of 1943 with regard to the petitioner's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Vs. Venkatasamy
Chennai
Feb-27-2012
Land Acquisition
Mr.V.Perumal Adv.
JUDGMENT1. Animadverting upon the judgments and decrees passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Hosur, in (i) L.A.O.P.Nos.47, 54, 55, 53, 79, 80, 83 and 86 of 1997 respectively dated 09.04.2008 and (ii) L.A.O.P.Nos. 45, 48, 50,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Seethayya Vs. P. Subramanya Somayajulu
Mumbai
Feb-14-1929
Property
(1929)31BOMLR756
Atkin, J.1. This is a consolidated appeal from the judgment of the High Court at Madras given in eleven suits of ejectment brought by the respondents against the respective appellants. Seven out of the eleven suits...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagappa Narayan Shetti Vs. Mukambe Venkatraman Shetti
Mumbai
Oct-17-1950
FamilyProperty
Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 3(3)
AIR1951Bom309; (1951)53BOMLR177; ILR1951Bom443
N.M. Shanbhag, Adv.
Bhagwati, J.1. This is a second appeal from a judgment of the learned Dist. J. Kanara, who confirmed the decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Honavar, in favour of the pltf. The facts which led...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhanjishaw Rattanji Karani Vs. Bombay Municipality
Mumbai
Sep-18-1944
Criminal
AIR1945Bom320; (1945)47BOMLR304
Bhagwati, J.1. The judgment first set out the pleadings and discussed issues of facts and proceeded : In the course of the evidence which was led on behalf of the plaintiff, Mr. Maneksha tendered the certified...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSundarabai Balappanaik Chitguppi Vs. Gurushiddappa Gurubasappa Bhusnur
Mumbai
Sep-24-1941
PropertyCivil
(1942)44BOMLR164
Divatia, J.1. This appeal arises in execution of a mortgage-decree. It is preferred by one of the judgment-debtors against the respondent who is the transferee of the decree from the original decree-holder. The objections raised by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Secretary of State for India Vs. Hargovandas Narottamdas Shah
Mumbai
Nov-22-1934
Civil
AIR1935Bom229; (1935)37BOMLR341
Rangnekar, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the respondents for a declaration that a certain plot of land, situate in the village of Kankanpur, in the Godhra taluka, belonged to plaintiff No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »