Advanced Search Results

Manonmani W/O Ponnuswamy and ors Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 & 227

Advocate for Respondent : Sri M. Ananth Kumar, Adv.; Sri Y.V. Parthasarathy, Advs.

ORDER1. Sn Y.V.Parthasarathy, learned advocate takes notice on behalf of respondent No.l. 2. Petitioners have sought for quashing the notice issued by respondent No.l-bank to auction the property in question.3. The records reveal that respondents 3...

Shree Arcee Steel Private Limited and anr. Vs. Bharat Overseas Bank Li ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 90 - Order 43, Rule 1; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26); Registration Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2005Kant287; III(2006)BC589; [2005]127CompCas537(Kar); ILR2005KAR2859; 2005(2)KarLJ472

Advocate for Respondent : Y.V. Parthasarathy, Adv. for Respondent-1 and ;Ananthram, Adv. for Respondent-2

K. Bhakthavatsala, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Order 43, Rule 1(j) of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenging the order dated 13-10-1995 made in Execution Case No. 1066 of 1996 on the file...

Vithal Vs. Ansabai and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1977Bom298; (1977)79BOMLR378; 1977MhLJ669

Advocate for Respondent : A.M. Dabir, Adv.

1. Plaintiff has filed this appeal against a concurrent decree passed by both the Courts dismissing his suit for a declaration that he is the adopted son of one Deobhan Buwa and that he is entitled...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar and Orissa Vs. Kameshwar Singh

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1933)35BOMLR731

Macmillan, J.1. Their Lordships have to dispose of two consolidated appeals from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna, dated November 25, 1929, dealing with certain questions referred to the Court by the...

Maneklal Kalidas Sheth Vs. Shivlal Dayaram Luvar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : AIR1939Bom26; (1938)40BOMLR1169

Rangnekar J.1. The only question in this appeal is one of limitation, as we agree with the learned First Class Subordinate Judge of Ahmedabad that on the merits there is no defence. The facts are these...

Jiban Krishna Das Vs. Jitendra Nath Das

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR442

Harilal Kania, Kt., C.J.I have read the judgment prepared by Mukherjea J. I agree with the reasoning and conclusion of that judgment and have nothing to add.Mukherjea, J.1. This appeal is directed against a judgment of...

Rajendra Prasad Boso Vs. Gopal Prasad Sen

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR1588

Binod Mitter, J.1. This is an appeal from the decree of the High Court of Judicature at Patna, dated December 16, 1927, which affirmed a decree of the Subordinate Judge at Cuttack, dated August 6, 1923,...

Maghraj Vs. Mst. Bayabai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR434

J.C. Shah, J.1. Seth Haroon and Sons a firm had ten partners. The Hindu undivided family of Jethmal Ramkaran mortgaged a house belonging to it to Seth Haroon and Sons to secure repayment of Rs. 40,000...

Raval and Co. Vs. K.G. Ramachandran and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 92; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 2(6), 2(8) and 4; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1974SC818; (1974)1SCC424; [1974]2SCR629

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeals Nos. 50 of 1968 and 1201 of 1970. From the judgment and Order dated the 20th January 1966, and' 26th November 1968 of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeals Nos....

Madhukar S/O Kisan Lokhande Vs. Smt. Shalu Wd/O Narendra Lokhande

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Meghe

Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) 1. Heard Shri Samudra for the appellant and Shri Meghe for the respondent. 2. Admit. Since the notice was issued for final disposal of the appeal, with consent of parties, same...