Advanced Search Results
Brijesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-30-2004
ServiceFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 8
2004(4)MPHT46; 2004(4)MPLJ43
V.P. Nema, Govt. Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This petition was originally filed before this Court on 9-5-1988, however, on account of the establishment of the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, this petition was transferred to it and after its abolition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra Singore and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-04-2005
Service
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak Recruitment and Service Conditions Rules, 2001
2006(1)MPHT8; 2005(4)MPLJ559
V.P. Nema, Govt. Adv.
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. Petitioners in this petition have assailed the advertisement (P-5), dated 16-9-2003 by which vacancies were advertised of contract teachers under the M.P. Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak Recruitment and Service Conditions Rules, 2001. Petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUpendra Kumar Kaliya Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-01-2013
Education
Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, Mr. Vikram Johri, Mr. L.C. Chourasiya, Mr. Hemant Shrivastava, Mr. Rajas Pohankar, Mr. O.P. Namdeo, Mr. Mukesh Agrawal, Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Mr. Umesh Pandey, Mr. Anoop Nair, Mr. V.K. Shukla, Mr. D.K. Tripathi
Review Petition No.986/2012 01.03.2013 Mr. Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A. No.14613/2012, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons assigned in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vikaram Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-23-2012
Land Acquisition
W.P.No.11112/2012 23.7.2012 Shri V. P. Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev K. Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. Petitioner is working as Senior Agriculture Development Officer and is posted in Block Bari, District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Prasad Burman Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-30-2012
Education
Narayan Prasad Burman versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.13732 ”30. 8.2012: Shri V.P.Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. Petitioner is working as Incharge Jan Shikshak, Jan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Ramcharan Nema Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-17-2012
Education
W.P.No.1028/2011 17.09.2012 Shri V.P.Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State on advance copy. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner claims grant of regular pay scale from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKadhori Lal Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-21-2012
Education
W.P.No.21157/2012 (Kadhori Lal Patel versus State of MP and otheRs.21.12.2012 Heard Shri V.P Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The only relief prayed for by the petitioner in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamlakhan Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-20-2012
Education
W.A.No.534/2012 Ram Lakhan Patel State of M.P. And others. 20.06.2012. Shri V.P.Nema, Counsel for the appellant. This appeal is directed against the order dated 27.4.2012 passed in W.P.no.6587/2012 by which the writ petition preferred by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSujeet Kumar Thakur Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-30-2013
Education
W.P.12771/2013 (S.K.Thakur versus State of M.P.& otheRs.30.07.2013 Shri V.P.Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 15.07.2013 by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra Pratap Singh Vs. Megma Sincorp Limited
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-27-2013
Education
1 W.P.No.3161/2013 27.2.2013 Shri V.P.Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner. Challenging an order Annexure P/1 dated 8.11.2011 passed by the Executing Officer, this writ petition has been filed. Proceedings were held under the Arbitration and Conciliation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »